Asus M4N68T

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
-
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.9%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive23.1% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
MotherboardAsus M4N68T  (all builds)
Memory1.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110228
Uptime2 Days
Run DateMar 16 '19 at 21:55
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User UKR-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
AMD Athlon II X2 250 (2013 D.Ri)
AM3, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
27.9% Poor
SC Int 78.4
SC Float 47.3
SC Mixed 59.8
50% 61.8 Pts
QC Int 156
QC Float 91.9
QC Mixed 111
27% 119 Pts
MC Int 155
MC Float 92.8
MC Mixed 113
18% 120 Pts
Poor: 17%
This bench: 27.9%
Great: 29%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$20
59GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 63 64 112 32 81 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
23.1% Poor
Read 169
Write 78.3
Mixed 70.9
SusWrite 75.7
22% 98.6 MB/s
4K Read 10.6
4K Write 17.3
4K Mixed 8.9
37% 12.3 MB/s
DQ Read 9.9
DQ Write 15.3
DQ Mixed 11.9
9% 12.4 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 23.1%
Great: 81%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$25
424GB free
Firmware: KC44
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 86 85 86 86 86 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
53.5% Above average
Read 100
Write 88.8
Mixed 46.3
SusWrite 86
59% 80.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.9
145% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 53.5%
Great: 77%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
27% Poor
MC Read 10.7
MC Write 6.9
MC Mixed 8.4
25% 8.67 GB/s
SC Read 8.3
SC Write 6.6
SC Mixed 7.2
21% 7.37 GB/s
Latency 75
53% 75 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 27%
Great: 40%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds (explanation by AdoredTV).

Typical M4N68T Builds (Compare 190 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M4N68T

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 44% - Average Total price: $275
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $350Nvidia GTX 1070 $400Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $104
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 $127Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $250Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $103
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X $252Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti $750Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $97
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $70SanDisk Extreme 64GB $128
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $728SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $73SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback