Today's hottest deals

Toshiba Satellite P300

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.69% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemToshiba Satellite P300  (all builds)
MotherboardTOSHIBA Satellite P300
Memory1.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20080414
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateMar 15 '19 at 19:28
Run Duration187 Seconds
Run User MLT-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo T9300-$70
U2E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
38.7% Below average
Memory 66.1
1-Core 34.1
2-Core 67.9
38% 56 Pts
4-Core 68.7
8-Core 70.1
9% 69.4 Pts
64-Core 66.1
4% 66.1 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 38.7%
Great: 42%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3400
Toshiba(1179 FF50) 128MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
0.69% Terrible
Lighting 0.77
Reflection 1.81
Parallax 0.5
1% 1.02 fps
MRender 1
Gravity 0.37
Splatting 1.43
1% 0.93 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.69%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Generic NCard SD Card 8GB
1GB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 8 5.8 5 4.4 3.8 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
6.15% Terrible
Read 14.4
Write 10.3
Mixed 5.2
SusWrite 6.3
7% 9.05 MB/s
4K Read 2.4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
100% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.15%
Great: 10%
Hitachi HTS542520K9SA00 200GB
25GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BBDOC33P
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 11 11 10 9.8 13 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
9.54% Terrible
Read 22.2
Write 16.4
Mixed 14
SusWrite 10.7
12% 15.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.5
93% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 9.54%
Great: 28%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR2
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
14.9% Very poor
MC Read 5.7
MC Write 3.9
MC Mixed 4.1
13% 4.57 GB/s
SC Read 3.7
SC Write 4.1
SC Mixed 4.2
11% 4 GB/s
Latency 111
36% 111 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 14.9%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Satellite P300 Builds (Compare 36 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Toshiba Satellite P300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $42
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $278WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback