Fujitsu ESPRIMO P500

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 60% Gunboat	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	1.93% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Fujitsu ESPRIMO P500 (all builds)
Motherboard	FUJITSU D2991-A1
Memory	0.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20110503
Uptime	1 Days
Run Date	Mar 15 '19 at 02:09
Run Duration	203 Seconds
Run User	FIN-User
Background CPU	32%

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2400-$250 166,255 User benchmarks, average bench 61% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	71.8% Very good	Memory 89.8 1-Core 82.3 2-Core 167 68% 113 Pts	4-Core 316 8-Core 295 41% 305 Pts	64-Core 316 20% 316 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 71.8% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 420 9,903 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Sapphire(174B 1621) 1GB CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	1.93% Terrible	Lighting 2.3 Reflection 2.62 Parallax 0.47 2% 1.79 fps	MRender 3.05 Gravity 2.13 Splatting 2.39 2% 2.52 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.93% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29 203,744 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 161GB free Firmware: 12.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 44 45 41 44 46 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	26.2% Poor	Read 46.5 Write 48 Mixed 39.5 SusWrite 44.2 33% 44.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.8 147% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 26.2% Great: 69%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$32 337,642 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 263GB free (System drive) Firmware: JC45 SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 47 47 34 16 22 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	21.4% Poor	Read 42 Write 50.5 Mixed 45 SusWrite 32.2 32% 42.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.7 129% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 21.4% Great: 68%
Generic- Compact Flash 32GB 28 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 4GB free, PID 0151 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 2 1.5 1.9 2 2.1 2.6 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	8.94% Terrible	Read 29.8 Write 17.8 Mixed 18.5 SusWrite 2 20% 17 MB/s	4K Read 4.7 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 1.7 109% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 8.94% Great: 17%
Generic- SD/MMC 128GB 67 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 119GB free, PID 0151 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 11 14 15 16 15 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	14.4% Very poor	Read 19.5 Write 19.3 Mixed 19 SusWrite 14.4 24% 18 MB/s	4K Read 4.3 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 2.8 193% 3.17 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 14.4% Great: 17%
LaCie P9230 4TB 54 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 34GB free, PID 106e Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 22 20 20 20 20 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	14% Very poor	Read 31 Write 24.8 Mixed 23.3 SusWrite 20.3 33% 24.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.7 81% 1 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 14% Great: 63%
LaCie Rugged Mini USB3 2TB 92 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 375GB free, PID 106b Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 19 19 19 19 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	11.2% Very poor	Read 26.8 Write 24 Mixed 25.5 SusWrite 18.9 32% 23.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.7 60% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 11.2% Great: 52%
LaCie P9220 1.5TB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 9GB free, PID 106d Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 19 19 19 19 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	13.7% Very poor	Read 29.5 Write 25.8 Mixed 23 SusWrite 18.9 32% 24.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.9 90% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 13.7% Great: 35%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5273DH0-CH9 3x4GB 485 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 3 of 4 slots used 12GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing as expected (60^th percentile)	39.3% Below average	MC Read 13.2 MC Write 13.7 MC Mixed 12.3 37% 13.1 GB/s	SC Read 9.4 SC Write 12.4 SC Mixed 12 32% 11.3 GB/s	Latency 67.4 59% 67.4 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 39.3% Great: 50%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ESPRIMO P500 Builds (Compare 109 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu ESPRIMO P500

CPU
Core i5-2500IntelBench 63%, 82,538 samples	34x
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples	31x
Core i7-2600Intel $186Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	16x

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	27x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	16x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	10x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	5x
Fury 120GBHyperX $160Bench 64%, 11,403 samples	5x
Sata III 256GBIntensoBench 67%, 2,573 samples	4x

RAM
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 2x4GBKingstonBench 49%, 26,466 samples	7x
16JTF51264AZ-1G6K1 RMR5040MM58F9F1600 8GBMicronBench 50%, 7 samples	4x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 21% - Poor

Total price: $28

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $64	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16