Gigabyte GA-MA790XT-UD4P

Performance Results


Gaming 15% Surfboard	Desktop 64% Destroyer	Workstation 12% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	22.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	46.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-MA790XT-UD4P (all builds)
Memory	6.6 GB free of 10 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	Χρώματα 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110908
Uptime	1.3 Days
Run Date	Mar 14 '19 at 22:05
Run Duration	147 Seconds
Run User	GRC-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X4 965-$144 43,442 User benchmarks, average bench 53% Socket M2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	58.1% Above average	Memory 83.3 1-Core 49.9 2-Core 100 50% 77.8 Pts	4-Core 197 8-Core 174 25% 186 Pts	64-Core 191 12% 191 Pts
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 58.1% Great: 61%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-$170 123,956 User benchmarks, average bench 20% Gigabyte(1458 354E) 2GB CLim: 1254 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 390.65 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	22.3% Poor	Lighting 26.4 Reflection 24.2 Parallax 32.4 22% 27.7 fps	MRender 33.1 Gravity 30.3 Splatting 26 24% 29.8 fps
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 22.3% Great: 21%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OCZ Trion 150 240GB-$196 15,660 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 80GB free (System drive) Firmware: SAFZ12.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 79 70 62 74 82 MB/s Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	46.7% Average	Read 217 Write 174 Mixed 152 SusWrite 74.8 34% 155 MB/s	4K Read 23.3 4K Write 50.9 4K Mixed 29.7 100% 34.6 MB/s	DQ Read 27.4 DQ Write 67.4 DQ Mixed 34.6 30% 43.1 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 46.7% Great: 95%
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$33 94,563 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 200GB free Firmware: 01.03B01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 86 70 63 76 80 MB/s Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	51.7% Above average	Read 103 Write 108 Mixed 63.2 SusWrite 76.9 64% 87.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 1 181% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 51.7% Great: 62%
Hitachi HDS721010CLA332 1TB 38 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 513GB free, PID 2509 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 24 25 24 24 24 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	13% Very poor	Read 24.5 Write 23.2 Mixed 22 SusWrite 24.3 32% 23.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.8 74% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 13% Great: 20%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 10GB 21,027 User benchmarks, average bench 31% null MHz 4096, 4096, 2048 MB Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	31.2% Below average	MC Read 12.8 MC Write 7.5 MC Mixed 11.4 30% 10.6 GB/s	SC Read 6.3 SC Write 6.3 SC Mixed 8.8 20% 7.13 GB/s	Latency 74.7 54% 74.7 ns
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 31.2% Great: 45%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-MA790XT-UD4P Builds (Compare 86 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 17%

Surfboard

Desktop 60%

Gunboat

Workstation 13%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-MA790XT-UD4P

CPU
Phenom II X4 955AMD $83Bench 51%, 41,403 samples	25x
Phenom II X4 945AMDBench 51%, 12,746 samples	11x
Phenom II X4 965AMD $144Bench 53%, 43,442 samples	11x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	5x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	5x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	5x

SSD
R5SL120G 120GBBench 62%, 596 samples	3x
BarraCuda Q5 ZP500CV30001 500GBSeagateBench 151%, 3,172 samples	3x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	3x

RAM
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	18x
12GBUnknownBench 35%, 85,415 samples	15x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	13x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 91% - Outstanding

Total price: $142

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16