Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 2875CTO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.35% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive42.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 2875CTO  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 2875CTO
Memory5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100301
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 14 '19 at 18:35
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium T4400-$110
U2E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.05 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
31.5% Below average
Memory 53.1
1-Core 30.9
2-Core 59.7
32% 47.9 Pts
4-Core 59.9
8-Core 61.4
8% 60.7 Pts
64-Core 59.7
4% 59.7 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 31.5%
Great: 41%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Mobile Series 4 Express Chipset Family
Legend(17AA 213A) 3.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2702
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.35% Terrible
Lighting 0.4
Reflection 0.35
Parallax 0.41
0% 0.38 fps
MRender 0.43
Gravity 0.4
Splatting 0.57
0% 0.46 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.35%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 240GB-$24
103GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR013
SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 196 202 190 190 186 MB/s
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
42.9% Average
Read 228
Write 203
Mixed 218
SusWrite 190
47% 210 MB/s
4K Read 15.9
4K Write 30
4K Mixed 15.2
60% 20.4 MB/s
DQ Read 95.9
DQ Write 86.6
DQ Mixed 45.2
46% 75.9 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 42.9%
Great: 92%
Corsair Survivor 3.0 127GB
65GB free, PID 1a0a
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 23 23 23 22 22 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
11.3% Very poor
Read 26.1
Write 22.4
Mixed 18.8
SusWrite 22.5
30% 22.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.9
61% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.3%
Great: 53%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM 15h Reserved
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
13.4% Very poor
MC Read 5.1
MC Write 3.7
MC Mixed 4
12% 4.27 GB/s
SC Read 4
SC Write 3.4
SC Mixed 4
11% 3.8 GB/s
Latency 150
27% 150 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 13.4%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $230Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback