Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 29% Raft	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 28% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	27.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME X370-PRO (all builds)
Memory	3.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20181208
Uptime	4.4 Days
Run Date	Mar 14 '19 at 04:58
Run Duration	1136 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	10%

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$195 144,475 User benchmarks, average bench 69% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	74.8% Very good	Memory 77.8 1-Core 98.6 2-Core 197 71% 124 Pts	4-Core 386 8-Core 644 63% 515 Pts	64-Core 994 62% 994 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 74.8% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 560-$500 60,738 User benchmarks, average bench 22% Gigabyte(1458 22ED) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1287 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.2.3 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	27.3% Poor	Lighting 33.5 Reflection 31.3 Parallax 40.2 27% 35 fps	MRender 31.4 Gravity 33.5 Splatting 34.9 27% 33.3 fps
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 27.3% Great: 25%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 165,668 User benchmarks, average bench 213% 48GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,812 Write 1,494 Mixed 684 294% 1,330 MB/s	4K Read 42.8 4K Write 98.7 4K Mixed 50.1 181% 63.9 MB/s	DQ Read 719 DQ Write 535 DQ Mixed 591 452% 615 MB/s
Poor: 153% Great: 254%
Seagate Backup+ Desk 8TB 662 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 60GB free Firmware: 0511 SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 81 80 79 79 79 MB/s Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	9.88% Terrible	Read 74 Write 87.2 Mixed 52 SusWrite 78.8 16% 73 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 9.6 4K Mixed 0.6 7% 3.7 MB/s	DQ Read 1.6 DQ Write 2 DQ Mixed 1.8 1% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 9.88% Great: 18%
Micron_1100_MTFDDAK2T0TBN 2TB 5,114 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 73GB free Firmware: M0MU031 SusWrite @10s intervals: 448 451 350 281 280 284 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	77.1% Very good	Read 64.7 Write 473 Mixed 364 SusWrite 349 72% 313 MB/s	4K Read 25.1 4K Write 81.3 4K Mixed 36.9 128% 47.8 MB/s	DQ Read 273 DQ Write 330 DQ Mixed 306 229% 303 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 77.1% Great: 101%
Seagate Expansion Desk 8TB 11,959 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 53GB free Firmware: 9401 SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 19 20 19 20 20 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	16.4% Very poor	Read 35.7 Write 37 Mixed 31.5 SusWrite 19.7 23% 31 MB/s	4K Read 1.6 4K Write 3.9 4K Mixed 0.5 194% 2 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 16.4% Great: 94%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 8TB 16,705 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 95GB free Firmware: D781 SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 87 87 87 83 88 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	61.9% Good	Read 128 Write 148 Mixed 36.7 SusWrite 86.1 72% 99.7 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 7.2 4K Mixed 0.8 272% 3.07 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 61.9% Great: 92%
Seagate Backup+ Desk 4TB 3,378 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 253GB free Firmware: 040B SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 87 87 87 83 88 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	52.8% Above average	Read 95.5 Write 110 Mixed 109 SusWrite 86.8 75% 100 MB/s	4K Read 2.4 4K Write 4.2 4K Mixed 0.6 244% 2.4 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 52.8% Great: 99%
Seagate Expansion Desk 5TB 11,776 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 47GB free Firmware: 0739 SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 173 161 136 112 169 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	78.6% Very good	Read 120 Write 126 Mixed 68.7 SusWrite 153 86% 117 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 3.6 4K Mixed 0.1 107% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 78.6% Great: 87%
ST8000AS 0002-1NA17Z 8TB 115 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 141GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 34 34 34 34 35 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	33.3% Below average	Read 34 Write 19 Mixed 15.7 SusWrite 34.4 33% 25.8 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 6.7 4K Mixed 0.5 249% 2.8 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 33.3% Great: 92%
WD My Book 25EE 8TB 12,029 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 63GB free, PID 25ee Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 84 83 85 83 88 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	53.1% Above average	Read 132 Write 126 Mixed 97 SusWrite 83.1 145% 110 MB/s	4K Read 1.8 4K Write 5 4K Mixed 1.3 221% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 53.1% Great: 98%
WD easystore 25FB 10TB 3,369 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 143GB free, PID 25fb Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 81 77 78 75 78 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	50.5% Above average	Read 124 Write 138 Mixed 96.7 SusWrite 76.8 146% 109 MB/s	4K Read 1.5 4K Write 5 4K Mixed 1.2 216% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 50.5% Great: 99%
WD easystore 25FB 8TB 7,734 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 82GB free, PID 25fb Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 21 21 21 21 22 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	24.3% Poor	Read 38.7 Write 35.5 Mixed 34.5 SusWrite 21.2 43% 32.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 4.5 4K Mixed 1.1 193% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 24.3% Great: 86%
WD My Passport 25E2 4TB 31,793 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 58GB free, PID 25e2 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 65 64 71 95 70 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	32.9% Below average	Read 91.3 Write 85.5 Mixed 61.5 SusWrite 70.9 103% 77.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.2 54% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 32.9% Great: 59%
WD easystore 25FB 10TB 3,369 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 277GB free, PID 25fb Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 196 187 179 113 109 183 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	69.2% Good	Read 132 Write 133 Mixed 94.7 SusWrite 161 178% 130 MB/s	4K Read 1.8 4K Write 4.7 4K Mixed 1.3 211% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 69.2% Great: 99%
WD My Passport 25E2 4TB 31,793 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 19GB free, PID 25e2 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 75 75 74 69 63 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	35.4% Below average	Read 107 Write 97 Mixed 66.2 SusWrite 73.5 113% 85.8 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.2 52% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 35.4% Great: 59%
WD easystore 25FB 10TB 3,369 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 42GB free, PID 25fb Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 84 83 84 83 87 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	60.7% Good	Read 185 Write 198 Mixed 115 SusWrite 83.3 190% 145 MB/s	4K Read 1.6 4K Write 5 4K Mixed 1.1 213% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 60.7% Great: 99%
WD My Book 25EE 8TB 12,029 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 242GB free, PID 25ee Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 86 88 87 83 87 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	48.9% Average	Read 101 Write 95.7 Mixed 95.8 SusWrite 86.4 128% 94.7 MB/s	4K Read 1.7 4K Write 4.9 4K Mixed 1.3 217% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 48.9% Great: 98%
WD easystore 25FB 10TB 3,369 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 611GB free, PID 25fb Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 23 30 23 26 23 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	29% Poor	Read 139 Write 39 Mixed 77 SusWrite 28.5 81% 70.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.8 58% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 29% Great: 99%
ST4000DM 000-1F2168 4TB 203 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 2GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 18 18 18 13 15 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	13.1% Very poor	Read 37 Write 32.7 Mixed 29.7 SusWrite 16.4 38% 28.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.7 71% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 13.1% Great: 62%
ST315003 41AS 1.5TB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 7GB free, PID 2339 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 19 19 19 18 19 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	13.9% Very poor	Read 36 Write 32.7 Mixed 24.8 SusWrite 19.4 37% 28.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.8 77% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 13.9% Great: 21%
WDC WD40 EFRX-68WT0N0 4TB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 51GB free, PID 2339 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	11.3% Very poor	Read 36.2 Write 32.2 Mixed 25.5 SusWrite 0.1 29% 23.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.8 94% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 11.3% Great: 14%
ST8000AS 0002-1NA17Z 8TB 115 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 25GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.1 0 0 0 0 0.2 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	32.2% Below average	Read 34 Write 33 Mixed 33 SusWrite 0 32% 25 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 8.8 4K Mixed 0.6 323% 3.43 MB/s	DQ Read 0.3 DQ Write 9.8 DQ Mixed 0.7 358% 3.6 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 32.2% Great: 92%
Hitachi HDS5C3030ALA630 3TB 11 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 18GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.6 2.2 2 2.2 2.3 15 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	10.9% Very poor	Read 37.5 Write 34 Mixed 30.3 SusWrite 4.6 34% 26.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.7 74% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 10.9% Great: 42%
Samsung D3 Station 4TB 1,261 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 13GB free, PID 6125 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 47 47 46 44 48 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	39.8% Below average	Read 168 Write 137 Mixed 73 SusWrite 46.5 131% 106 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.8 88% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 39.8% Great: 68%
Hitachi HDS5C3030ALA630 3TB 19GB free, PID 2339 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.3 2.4 2.3 2.4 2.4 2.4 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	11.6% Very poor	Read 37.2 Write 33.8 Mixed 32 SusWrite 2.5 34% 26.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.7 87% 1.03 MB/s

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB-$48 606,405 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2933 MHz clocked @ 1467 MHz Performing below potential (74^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	93% Outstanding	MC Read 38.3 MC Write 32 MC Mixed 32.2 98% 34.2 GB/s	SC Read 21.7 SC Write 34.5 SC Mixed 22.7 75% 26.3 GB/s	Latency 84.7 47% 84.7 ns
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 93% Great: 104%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME X370-PRO Builds (Compare 2,544 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 74%

Battleship

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 72%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	421x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $211Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	328x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	205x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	219x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	194x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	190x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	95x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	89x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	75x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $48Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	161x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	124x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	58x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 88% - Excellent

Total price: $647

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results

PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

Feedback

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)