Asrock AM1B-M

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 28%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.09% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock AM1B-M  (all builds)
Memory5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140128
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 13 '19 at 21:00
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon 5150 APU R3
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
32.6% Below average
Memory 51.9
1-Core 24.8
2-Core 49.8
29% 42.2 Pts
4-Core 77.3
8-Core 90
11% 83.7 Pts
64-Core 96
6% 96 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 32.6%
Great: 36%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 5450
Asus(1043 0471) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 9.2.0.0
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.09% Terrible
Lighting 1.33
Reflection 1.58
Parallax 1.59
1% 1.5 fps
MRender 1.71
Gravity 0.83
Splatting 1.43
1% 1.33 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.09%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$20
386GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP73
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 78 92 96 93 96 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
43.6% Average
Read 62.2
Write 21.9
Mixed 22.7
SusWrite 90.1
36% 49.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.4
64% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 43.6%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 99U5471-037.A00LF 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
18.9% Very poor
MC Read 7.9
MC Write 4.4
MC Mixed 7
18% 6.43 GB/s
SC Read 5.3
SC Write 3.9
SC Mixed 6.4
15% 5.2 GB/s
Latency 154
26% 154 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 18.9%
Great: 27%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical AM1B-M Builds (Compare 24 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 31%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock AM1B-M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 31% - Below average Total price: $20
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback