Today's hottest deals

Acer Aspire 3410

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 24%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.24% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive36.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Aspire 3410  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire 3410
Memory1.1 GB free of 3 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores, 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20091125
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 08 '19 at 09:31
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron 723
CPU, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads
Base clock 1.2 GHz, turbo 1.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
33.3% Below average
Memory 64.6
1-Core 15.5
2-Core 14.9
27% 31.7 Pts
4-Core 15
8-Core 15
2% 15 Pts
64-Core 14.6
1% 14.6 Pts
Poor: 12%
This bench: 33.3%
Great: 33%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Mobile Series 4 Express Chipset Family
Acer(1025 0229)
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2702
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.24% Terrible
Lighting 0.33
Reflection 0.27
Parallax 0.16
0% 0.25 fps
MRender 0.29
Gravity 0.13
Splatting 0.22
0% 0.21 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.24%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingdian S280 120GB
97GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q1115A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 157 189 188 202 202 MB/s
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
36.4% Below average
Read 224
Write 197
Mixed 193
SusWrite 185
45% 200 MB/s
4K Read 13
4K Write 25.6
4K Mixed 11.2
48% 16.6 MB/s
DQ Read 40.1
DQ Write 40
DQ Mixed 24.9
23% 35 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 36.4%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown M471B5673EH1-CF8 02FE EBJ11UE6BAU0-AE-E 3GB
800, 800 MHz
2048, 1024 MB
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
11.7% Very poor
MC Read 3.5
MC Write 3.5
MC Mixed 3.1
10% 3.37 GB/s
SC Read 3.1
SC Write 3.5
SC Mixed 3
9% 3.2 GB/s
Latency 115
35% 115 ns
Poor: 7%
This bench: 11.7%
Great: 14%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire 3410 Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: Acer Aspire 3410

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback