Asus MAXIMUS VI IMPACT

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics17.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive91% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS VI IMPACT  (all builds)
Memory12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1600 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140815
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 05 '19 at 21:28
Run Duration180 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770K-$120
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
91.5% Outstanding
Memory 97.4
1-Core 134
2-Core 264
93% 165 Pts
4-Core 473
8-Core 609
69% 541 Pts
64-Core 701
43% 701 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 91.5%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
CLim: 1346 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 419.17
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
17.7% Very poor
Lighting 22
Reflection 17.7
Parallax 20.6
18% 20.1 fps
MRender 25.3
Gravity 22.7
Splatting 17.5
17% 21.8 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 17.7%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial M500 960GB-$59
843GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 402 377 397 392 391 390 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
91% Outstanding
Read 393
Write 392
Mixed 298
SusWrite 392
83% 369 MB/s
4K Read 21.7
4K Write 99.5
4K Mixed 29.5
123% 50.2 MB/s
DQ Read 314
DQ Write 316
DQ Mixed 186
175% 272 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 91%
Great: 101%
USB 2.0 SD/MMC Reader 8GB
3GB free, PID 6700
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.8 8 8 7.9 8.5 8.5 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
4.2% Terrible
Read 12.2
Write 4.8
Mixed 5.5
SusWrite 8.1
9% 7.65 MB/s
4K Read 2.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
10% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.2%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Savage DDR3 2400 C11 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
85.7% Excellent
MC Read 31.8
MC Write 32.3
MC Mixed 26.8
87% 30.3 GB/s
SC Read 18.9
SC Write 24.8
SC Mixed 27.5
68% 23.7 GB/s
Latency 48.8
82% 48.8 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 85.7%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS VI IMPACT Builds (Compare 207 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VI IMPACT - $249

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $478
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $153
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback