bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics4.58% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive27.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
System
MotherboardIntel DP43TF
Memory4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20080804
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateMar 05 '19 at 21:04
Run Duration170 Seconds
Run User SRB-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q9650-$170
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
37% Below average
Memory 62.9
1-Core 32.8
2-Core 57.3
35% 51 Pts
4-Core 67.8
8-Core 68.8
9% 68.3 Pts
64-Core 64.6
4% 64.6 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 37%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9600 GT
Nvidia(10DE 0545) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.1
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
4.58% Terrible
Lighting 5.33
Reflection 8
Parallax 2.12
4% 5.15 fps
MRender 8.62
Gravity 3.97
Splatting 6.09
5% 6.22 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.58%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingdian S200 60GB
25GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P0921B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 63 71 74 73 70 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
27.2% Poor
Read 199
Write 71.7
Mixed 84.2
SusWrite 67.2
23% 106 MB/s
4K Read 13
4K Write 36.7
4K Mixed 6.1
47% 18.6 MB/s
DQ Read 16.3
DQ Write 57.7
DQ Mixed 7.5
14% 27.2 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 27.2%
Great: 69%
Hitachi HDP725025GLAT80 250GB
232GB free
Firmware: GM2OA42A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 75 76 72 89 84 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
46.9% Average
Read 87
Write 82.2
Mixed 50
SusWrite 76.1
54% 73.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
147% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 46.9%
Great: 48%
Intenso USB 3.0 device 1TB
714GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 18 19 20 20 19 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
14.4% Very poor
Read 30.9
Write 29.2
Mixed 21.7
SusWrite 18.9
19% 25.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
111% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 14.4%
Great: 63%
ST9500420AS 500GB
249GB free, PID 1068
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 17 17 17 17 17 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
12.2% Very poor
Read 30.5
Write 25.7
Mixed 22.9
SusWrite 16.7
31% 24 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
70% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12.2%
Great: 37%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR2
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
15.8% Very poor
MC Read 4.5
MC Write 5.1
MC Mixed 5.3
14% 4.97 GB/s
SC Read 4
SC Write 4.7
SC Mixed 4.5
13% 4.4 GB/s
Latency 119
34% 119 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 15.8%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,296 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback