Performance Results


Gaming 23% Surfboard	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 18% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	31.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	88.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

PC Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-6100TE 68 User benchmarks, average bench 58% CPU1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	62.1% Good	Memory 84 1-Core 84.5 2-Core 150 64% 106 Pts	4-Core 235 8-Core 236 32% 236 Pts	64-Core 234 14% 234 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 62.1% Great: 64%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro M4000 9,043 User benchmarks, average bench 32% HP(103C 1153) ≥ 4GB CLim: 772 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 397.93 Performing below potential (72^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	31.7% Below average	Lighting 38.4 Reflection 37.8 Parallax 35.5 31% 37.3 fps	MRender 47.9 Gravity 33.9 Splatting 38.3 32% 40 fps
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 31.7% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSNF256GMCS 256GB 846 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 210GB free (System drive) Firmware: FSTAN103 SusWrite @10s intervals: 376 374 419 421 423 409 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	88.5% Excellent	Read 366 Write 342 Mixed 366 SusWrite 404 83% 369 MB/s	4K Read 22.7 4K Write 49.9 4K Mixed 37.1 108% 36.6 MB/s	DQ Read 359 DQ Write 304 DQ Mixed 335 250% 333 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 88.5% Great: 81%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 4TB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 3.5TB free Firmware: 0.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 123 132 124 127 133 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	69.3% Good	Read 114 Write 122 Mixed 63.4 SusWrite 128 78% 107 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.7 135% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 69.3% Great: 69%
USB DISK 2.0 64GB 238 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 47GB free, PID 9917 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.6 4.8 2.4 3.3 7.2 MB/s Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	5.87% Terrible	Read 17 Write 1.8 Mixed 4.5 SusWrite 3.9 7% 6.8 MB/s	4K Read 3 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.9 62% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.87% Great: 15%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown i-DIMM 1x8GB 156 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	42.5% Average	MC Read 14.7 MC Write 14.8 MC Mixed 12.8 40% 14.1 GB/s	SC Read 12.1 SC Write 14.9 SC Mixed 14.9 40% 14 GB/s	Latency 73.5 54% 73.5 ns
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 42.5% Great: 43%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 11%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples	2x
Quadro M4000NvidiaBench 32%, 9,043 samples	1x

SSD
850 EVO mSATA 500GBSamsungBench 100%, 3,936 samples	1x
THNSNF256GMCS 256GBToshibaBench 63%, 846 samples	1x
MS M310 128GBCIEBench 26%, 1 sample	1x

RAM
9905668-002.A00G 2x8GBKingstonBench 73%, 315 samples	1x
CT8G4SFD8213.C16FBD1 2x8GBCrucialBench 73%, 670 samples	1x
i-DIMM 1x8GBUnknownBench 32%, 156 samples	1x