Today's hottest deals

Toshiba Satellite Pro C650

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.59% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemToshiba Satellite Pro C650  (all builds)
MotherboardTOSHIBA Portable PC
Memory1.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110628
Uptime15.9 Days
Run DateMar 01 '19 at 23:13
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3 M 380-$130
CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.55 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
44.1% Average
Memory 60.9
1-Core 53.2
2-Core 121
46% 78.4 Pts
4-Core 160
8-Core 157
21% 159 Pts
64-Core 159
10% 159 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 44.1%
Great: 46%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)
Toshiba(1179 FDE2) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2900
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
0.59% Terrible
Lighting 0.63
Reflection 0.85
Parallax 0.66
0% 0.71 fps
MRender 1
Gravity 0.5
Splatting 1.09
1% 0.86 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.59%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Momentus 5400.6 2.5" 500GB-$32
439GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0011LVM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 57 62 74 70 72 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
40.2% Average
Read 73.7
Write 72.7
Mixed 39.3
SusWrite 66.3
46% 63 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
126% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 40.2%
Great: 43%
Adata Nobility N005 Pro USB 3.0 32GB-$34
8GB free, PID 105b
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 23 23 24 23 20 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
10.5% Very poor
Read 26
Write 19.7
Mixed 13.5
SusWrite 22.4
27% 20.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
22% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 10.5%
Great: 37%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5273CH0-CF8 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 1067 MHz
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
20.5% Poor
MC Read 6.5
MC Write 6.7
MC Mixed 6.9
19% 6.7 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 5
SC Mixed 6.6
18% 6.27 GB/s
Latency 125
32% 125 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 20.5%
Great: 22%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Satellite Pro C650 Builds (Compare 33 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Toshiba Satellite Pro C650

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 42% - Average Total price: $199
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $330
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback