Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	4.5% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo E7600-$191 4,159 User benchmarks, average bench 40% U2E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3.05 GHz Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	45.3% Average	Memory 76.9 1-Core 42.9 2-Core 79.6 44% 66.5 Pts	4-Core 84.8 8-Core 73.1 11% 78.9 Pts	64-Core 82.1 5% 82.1 Pts
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 45.3% Great: 46%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4670 2,160 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Apple(106B 00B6) 256MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.812.0.0 Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	4.5% Terrible	Lighting 5.53 Reflection 8.19 Parallax 3.31 4% 5.68 fps	MRender 5.43 Gravity 3.5 Splatting 6.91 4% 5.28 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 4.5% Great: 5%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
APPLE SD Card Reader 16GB 23 User benchmarks, average bench 9% 7GB free, PID 8403 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 18 19 19 18 17 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	15.8% Very poor	Read 19 Write 18 Mixed 18.5 SusWrite 18.1 25% 18.4 MB/s	4K Read 4.9 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 3.1 212% 3.53 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 15.8% Great: 16%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 12GB 85,415 User benchmarks, average bench 35% null MHz 4096, 4096, 2048, 2048 MB Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	17.5% Very poor	MC Read 6.9 MC Write 5.1 MC Mixed 4.9 16% 5.63 GB/s	SC Read 3.4 SC Write 1.5 SC Mixed 3.3 8% 2.73 GB/s	Latency 86.5 46% 86.5 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 17.5% Great: 50%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 42%

Speed boat

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core2 Duo E7600Intel $191Bench 40%, 4,159 samples	19x
Core2 Duo E8600Intel $180Bench 44%, 6,109 samples	1x
Core2 Duo E8500Intel $110Bench 42%, 18,841 samples	1x

GPU
Mobility Radeon HD 4670ATIBench 4%, 2,160 samples	13x
GeForce 9400NvidiaBench 1%, 668 samples	8x

Value: 41% - Average

Total price: $219

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16