Asus X99-A II

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics46.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive123% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus X99-A II  (all builds)
Memory60.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180419
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 01 '19 at 16:23
Run Duration255 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
84.6% Excellent
Memory 92.5
1-Core 103
2-Core 194
76% 130 Pts
4-Core 413
8-Core 676
67% 545 Pts
64-Core 847
52% 847 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 84.6%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
CLim: 1268 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 17.12.1
Performing below potential (69th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
46.2% Average
Lighting 56.9
Reflection 66.4
Parallax 72.7
46% 65.3 fps
MRender 64.2
Gravity 54.1
Splatting 52.2
46% 56.8 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 46.2%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 5 Volume 960GB
810GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 228 227 224 206 173 146 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
123% Outstanding
Read 1,516
Write 366
Mixed 478
SusWrite 201
139% 640 MB/s
4K Read 36.8
4K Write 30.6
4K Mixed 33.1
114% 33.5 MB/s
DQ Read 491
DQ Write 159
DQ Mixed 185
173% 278 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 123%
Great: 139%
Crucial MX300 275GB-$100
254GB free
Firmware: M0CR060
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 93 94 103 122 129 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
77.1% Very good
Read 457
Write 455
Mixed 388
SusWrite 107
79% 352 MB/s
4K Read 23.8
4K Write 87.8
4K Mixed 36.6
130% 49.4 MB/s
DQ Read 232
DQ Write 315
DQ Mixed 302
220% 283 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 77.1%
Great: 95%
Seagate Backup+ Desk 8TB
885GB free
Firmware: 0511
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 145 143 147 144 147 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
16.4% Very poor
Read 124
Write 164
Mixed 92.2
SusWrite 145
30% 131 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 10.5
4K Mixed 1
8% 4.1 MB/s
DQ Read 2.1
DQ Write 10
DQ Mixed 3.3
3% 5.13 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 16.4%
Great: 18%
Hitachi HDS722020ALA330 2TB-$71
205GB free
Firmware: JKAOA3EA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 73 73 73 73 73 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
51.6% Above average
Read 107
Write 106
Mixed 61.5
SusWrite 72.4
64% 86.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 51.6%
Great: 69%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80
1TB free
Firmware: MX6OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 126 126 127 130 130 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
78.6% Very good
Read 147
Write 144
Mixed 20.7
SusWrite 127
79% 109 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
176% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 78.6%
Great: 107%
WD Green 2TB (2009)-$113
2TB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 96 97 97 97 96 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
55.3% Above average
Read 96.2
Write 93.5
Mixed 52
SusWrite 96
62% 84.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.8
161% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 55.3%
Great: 60%
Seagate ST8000DM005-2EH1 8TB
2TB free
Firmware: DN02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 90 92 100 116 129 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 22% Great: 104%
Seagate ST8000DM005-2EH1 8TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: DN02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 91 92 102 117 134 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 22% Great: 104%
Seagate BUP BK 4TB
2TB free
Firmware: 0304
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 119 120 119 118 118 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
65.7% Good
Read 110
Write 75.5
Mixed 94.2
SusWrite 118
74% 99.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 0.6
227% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 65.7%
Great: 65%
AFT PRO77U SS -1 128GB
111GB free, PID 3114, Lexar Professional 128Gb
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 35 37 35 34 37 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
50.2% Above average
Read 89.5
Write 36.2
Mixed 41.3
SusWrite 35.1
60% 50.5 MB/s
4K Read 13.5
4K Write 8.6
4K Mixed 9.1
652% 10.4 MB/s
DQ Read 18
DQ Write 7
DQ Mixed 8
577% 11 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 50.2%
Great: 50%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS16G4D240FSE.16FA 4x16GB
4 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
112% Outstanding
MC Read 44.1
MC Write 43
MC Mixed 43.5
124% 43.5 GB/s
SC Read 15.7
SC Write 19.8
SC Mixed 22
55% 19.2 GB/s
Latency 63.1
63% 63.1 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 112%
Great: 129%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-A II Builds (Compare 1,409 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 77%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus X99-A II - $294

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $668
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback