Lenovo 20EV0023JP

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics6.07% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 20EV0023JP  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20EV0023JP
Memory8.6 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180927
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateFeb 28 '19 at 10:40
Run Duration180 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-6100U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
57.8% Above average
Memory 80.8
1-Core 72.6
2-Core 127
58% 93.3 Pts
4-Core 204
8-Core 204
27% 204 Pts
64-Core 202
12% 202 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)
Legend(17AA 5048) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6472
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
6.07% Terrible
Lighting 6.47
Reflection 9.12
Parallax 6.06
5% 7.21 fps
MRender 7
Gravity 5.67
Splatting 13.5
8% 8.71 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.07%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WD5000LPVX-08V0TT6 275GB
197GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0CR060
SusWrite @10s intervals: 374 378 296 149 141 142 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 390
Write 343
Mixed 314
SusWrite 247
73% 324 MB/s
4K Read 23.8
4K Write 70.9
4K Mixed 32.9
116% 42.5 MB/s
DQ Read 232
DQ Write 255
DQ Mixed 280
201% 256 MB/s
Seagate ST1000LM048-2E7172 1TB
649GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 123 121 121 121 121 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
55.8% Above average
Read 73.3
Write 118
Mixed 57.9
SusWrite 120
68% 92.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 3.6
4K Mixed 0.2
122% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 71%
UFD USB Flash Drive 30GB
19GB free, PID a838
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 25 53 56 58 58 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
17.7% Very poor
Read 34.7
Write 6.5
Mixed 13.7
SusWrite 44.8
32% 24.9 MB/s
4K Read 3.1
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 1.1
73% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 17.7%
Great: 29%
I-O DATA USB Flash Disk 8GB
1GB free, PID 101a
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.7 8.5 8.5 8.5 8.6 8.5 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
6.48% Terrible
Read 18.7
Write 7.7
Mixed 7
SusWrite 8.2
12% 10.4 MB/s
4K Read 3.2
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.4
39% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.48%
Great: 6%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown PSD3L1600C118GVS 0467 RMT3170MN68F9F1600 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
48.2% Average
MC Read 16.8
MC Write 17.1
MC Mixed 15.4
47% 16.4 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 16
44% 15.4 GB/s
Latency 79.1
51% 79.1 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 48.2%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $158
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback