Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 65% Destroyer	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	4.81% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	34.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 930-$199 19,497 User benchmarks, average bench 64% LGA1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	69.7% Good	Memory 95.6 1-Core 74.4 2-Core 144 65% 105 Pts	4-Core 239 8-Core 344 36% 292 Pts	64-Core 338 21% 338 Pts
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 69.7% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 5570 12,172 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Asus(1043 035C) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004 Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	4.81% Terrible	Lighting 6.17 Reflection 6.73 Parallax 5.09 5% 6 fps	MRender 5.76 Gravity 4.33 Splatting 5.83 4% 5.31 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.81% Great: 5%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra Plus 256GB-$139 17,545 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 210GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0956 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value	34.4% Below average	Read 130 Write 125 Mixed 126 28% 127 MB/s	4K Read 20.8 4K Write 38.5 4K Mixed 11.9 67% 23.7 MB/s	DQ Read 26.3 DQ Write 57.4 DQ Mixed 12.2 18% 32 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 34.4% Great: 99%
USB Mass Storage Device 128GB 75 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 29GB free, PID 121c Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	7.01% Terrible	Read 16 Write 5.84 Mixed 9.93 12% 10.6 MB/s	4K Read 3.43 4K Write 0.85 4K Mixed 0.65 64% 1.64 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 7.01% Great: 19%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 6x4GB 28,320 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 6 of 6 slots used 24GB DIMM Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	57.1% Above average	MC Read 21.2 MC Write 18.5 MC Mixed 21.3 58% 20.3 GB/s	SC Read 11.8 SC Write 11.6 SC Mixed 13.3 35% 12.2 GB/s	Latency 55.2 72% 55.2 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 57.1% Great: 61%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 33%

Sail boat

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 26%

Raft

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $318

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16