HP Compaq 8200 Elite MT PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics8.95% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive75% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemHP Compaq 8200 Elite MT PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1495
Memory16.7 GB free of 20 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20160404
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 25 '19 at 12:27
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$80
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
68.5% Good
Memory 75.8
1-Core 98.8
2-Core 193
70% 122 Pts
4-Core 332
8-Core 472
50% 402 Pts
64-Core 469
29% 469 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 68.5%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 250E
Sapphire(174B E213) 1GB
CLim: 800 MHz, MLim: 1125 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 16.7.3
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
8.95% Terrible
Lighting 10.1
Reflection 13.7
Parallax 13.5
8% 12.4 fps
MRender 11.4
Gravity 9.07
Splatting 16.2
10% 12.2 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 8.95%
Great: 10%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSDSC2BW240A3H 240GB
20GB free (System drive)
Firmware: LCSi
SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 176 177 170 164 179 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
75% Very good
Read 378
Write 232
Mixed 257
SusWrite 172
58% 260 MB/s
4K Read 32.2
4K Write 55
4K Mixed 34.8
122% 40.7 MB/s
DQ Read 293
DQ Write 224
DQ Mixed 244
186% 253 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 75%
Great: 92%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$66
764GB free
Firmware: 12.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 84 84 86 86 86 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
49.2% Average
Read 86.1
Write 88.2
Mixed 76.1
SusWrite 85
62% 83.8 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
147% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 49.2%
Great: 67%
ST325062 3A 250GB
52GB free, PID 0502
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 24 24 24 24 24 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
10.8% Very poor
Read 28.9
Write 9.3
Mixed 11.8
SusWrite 24.1
23% 18.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.4
29% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 10.8%
Great: 24%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351U7CFR8C-H9 Corsair CMV4GX3M1A1600C11 HMT351U7CFR8C-H9 Corsair CMZ8GX3M1A1600C10 20GB
800, 800, 800, 800 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
30.3% Below average
MC Read 10.1
MC Write 10.1
MC Mixed 9.2
28% 9.8 GB/s
SC Read 9.2
SC Write 11.3
SC Mixed 9.9
29% 10.1 GB/s
Latency 88.8
45% 88.8 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq 8200 Elite MT PC Builds (Compare 287 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 8200 Elite MT PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $291
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback