PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 8.95% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
Boot Drive | 75% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
System | HP Compaq 8200 Elite MT PC (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 1495 |
Memory | 16.7 GB free of 20 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20160404 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Feb 25 '19 at 12:27 |
Run Duration | 145 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 4% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
68.5%
Good
|
70% 122 Pts
|
50% 402 Pts
|
29% 469 Pts
|
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() AMD R7 250E
Sapphire(174B E213) 1GB
CLim: 800 MHz, MLim: 1125 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 16.7.3
|
8.95%
Terrible
|
8% 12.4 fps
|
10% 12.2 fps
|
|
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
30.3%
Below average
|
28% 9.8 GB/s
|
29% 10.1 GB/s
|
45% 88.8 ns
|
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
---|---|
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples | 135x |
Core i7-2600Intel $80Bench 67%, 185,630 samples | 94x |
Core i5-2500IntelBench 63%, 82,538 samples | 39x |
![]() |
|
---|---|
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 57x |
GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples | 25x |
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples | 25x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 55% - Above average | Total price: $291 |