TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Datalogic 965P-S3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 33%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.67% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemDatalogic 965P-S3  (all builds)
MotherboardGigabyte 965P-S3
Memory1.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colores,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20070111
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 24 '19 at 17:40
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 6600-$90
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
37.4% Below average
Memory 68.8
1-Core 23.9
2-Core 24.3
31% 39 Pts
4-Core 38.9
8-Core 40
5% 39.5 Pts
64-Core 50.6
3% 50.6 Pts
Poor: 25% ↑
This bench: 37.4%
 Great: 43%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon X1950 Pro
Device(18BC 2892) 512MB
Driver: atiumdag Ver. 8.56.1.16
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
1.67% Terrible
Lighting 3.1
Reflection 2.65
Parallax 1.47
2% 2.41 fps
Poor: 1% ↑
This bench: 1.67%
 Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$26
744GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 15 17 23 20 13 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
23.9% Poor
Read 65.1
Write 69.9
Mixed 41.4
SusWrite 18
36% 48.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
101% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑
This bench: 23.9%
 Great: 107%
Maxtor STM3320820AS 320GB
263GB free
Firmware: 3.AAE
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 64 70 63 70 69 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
38.6% Below average
Read 68.8
Write 35.2
Mixed 34.6
SusWrite 65.4
37% 51 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
116% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑
This bench: 38.6%
 Great: 44%
TOSHIBA MK1637GSX 160GB
72GB free, PID 0c31
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 18 18 17 18 18 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
11.1% Very poor
Read 24
Write 20.5
Mixed 21.2
SusWrite 17.6
28% 20.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.4
56% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑
This bench: 11.1%
 Great: 17%
WD Elements 1.5TB
228GB free, PID 1021
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 17 18 17 18 18 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
12.1% Very poor
Read 22.5
Write 17.8
Mixed 20
SusWrite 17.3
26% 19.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
81% 1 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑
This bench: 12.1%
 Great: 22%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x1GB
4 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
15.5% Very poor
MC Read 5.5
MC Write 4.3
MC Mixed 4.6
14% 4.8 GB/s
SC Read 3.9
SC Write 3.5
SC Mixed 4.3
11% 3.9 GB/s
Latency 104
38% 104 ns
Poor: 11% ↑
This bench: 15.5%
 Great: 28%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback