Asus B85M-G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 80%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics102% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive38.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus B85M-G  (all builds)
Memory12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150722
Uptime3.1 Days
Run DateFeb 24 '19 at 13:02
Run Duration189 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU 21%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4670-$51
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
78.3% Very good
Memory 90
1-Core 105
2-Core 210
78% 135 Pts
4-Core 388
8-Core 376
51% 382 Pts
64-Core 358
22% 358 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 78.3%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 419.17
Performing below potential (43rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
102% Outstanding
Lighting 125
Reflection 122
Parallax 133
102% 127 fps
MRender 174
Gravity 118
Splatting 97.8
102% 130 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 102%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 480GB-$40
211GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z32070RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 70 64 64 145 98 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
38.5% Below average
Read 287
Write 328
Mixed 20
SusWrite 79.9
40% 179 MB/s
4K Read 13.6
4K Write 74.7
4K Mixed 0.2
60% 29.5 MB/s
DQ Read 147
DQ Write 125
DQ Mixed 24.7
49% 98.8 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 38.5%
Great: 76%
Samsung 830 128GB-$109
11GB free
Firmware: CXM03B1Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 210
Write 206
Mixed 155
42% 190 MB/s
4K Read 16.2
4K Write 49.8
4K Mixed 19.3
76% 28.4 MB/s
DQ Read 181
DQ Write 71.1
DQ Mixed 101
81% 118 MB/s
Poor: 48% Great: 76%
Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000.C 1TB-$40
541GB free
Firmware: JP4OA3EA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 113 112 112 112 113 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
60.2% Good
Read 97.5
Write 91.7
Mixed 52
SusWrite 112
65% 88.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 60.2%
Great: 74%
Samsung Spinpoint T166 500GB-$40
70GB free
Firmware: CR100-10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 43 43 43 43 44 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
32.8% Below average
Read 70.5
Write 31.2
Mixed 31
SusWrite 43.4
32% 44 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
140% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 32.8%
Great: 44%
Samsung HD103SI 1TB-$89
384GB free
Firmware: 1AG01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 64 65 65 66 66 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
41.3% Average
Read 78.7
Write 45.2
Mixed 46
SusWrite 65
43% 58.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
142% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 41.3%
Great: 59%
Prolific RAID1 4TB
2.5TB free, PID 2775
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 156 155 157 160 153 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
63% Good
Read 160
Write 135
Mixed 89.5
SusWrite 155
179% 135 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1.1
105% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 63%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5173CB0-CK0 M378B5173QH0-CK0 M378B5173CB0-CK0 M378B5173QH0-CK0 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
58.7% Above average
MC Read 20.9
MC Write 22.1
MC Mixed 17.9
58% 20.3 GB/s
SC Read 15.3
SC Write 19.5
SC Mixed 18.4
51% 17.7 GB/s
Latency 67.2
60% 67.2 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 58.7%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B85M-G Builds (Compare 5,927 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus B85M-G - $80

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $317
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4070 $515Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback