Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

TEST
YOUR PC

ADD TO PC
BUILD

Foxconn A85GM

Performance Results


Gaming 24% Surfboard	Desktop 63% Destroyer	Workstation 18% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	39.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	35.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

8 years ago, 8 years ago.

Motherboard	Foxconn A85GM (all builds)
Memory	6.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100603
Uptime	0.5 Days
Run Date	Aug 09 '16 at 18:58
Run Duration	221 Seconds
Run User	JPN-User
Background CPU	30%

PC Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X6 1065T 1,141 User benchmarks, average bench 55% Socket 940, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	56.7% Above average	Memory 82.1 1-Core 50.1 2-Core 99.8 50% 77.3 Pts	4-Core 171 8-Core 256 26% 214 Pts	64-Core 255 16% 255 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 56.7% Great: 60%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 280X-$500 94,130 User benchmarks, average bench 35% XFX(1682 3001) 3GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 16.300.2511.0 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	39.2% Below average	Lighting 50.9 Reflection 34.3 Parallax 67 42% 50.7 fps	MRender 32.6 Gravity 50.3 Splatting 42.8 35% 41.9 fps
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 39.2% Great: 39%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX200 500GB-$90 17,487 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 235GB free (System drive) Firmware: MU02 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 3207 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 744 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 15 (AE) Unknown 100 100 40 (B4) Unknown 0 0 5540 (B7) Unknown 100 100 4 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 67 57 184684183585 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 2 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 100 0 (CE) Flying height 100 100 0 (D2) Unknown 100 100 0 (F6) Unknown 100 100 9354164996 (F7) Unknown 100 100 292625682 (F8) Unknown 100 100 250560496	35.6% Below average	Read 180 Write 153 Mixed 130 34% 154 MB/s	4K Read 19.3 4K Write 34.4 4K Mixed 10.4 61% 21.4 MB/s	DQ Read 21 DQ Write 36.9 DQ Mixed 8.83 12% 22.2 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 35.6% Great: 105%
Hitachi HDS721050CLA362 500GB-$59 47,815 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 261GB free Firmware: JP2OA3MA Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (79^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 65536 (02) Throughput performance 137 137 90 (03) Spinup time 117 117 12897681603 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 3587 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 138 138 31 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 14228 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1126 (C0) Power-off retract count 97 97 3779 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 97 97 3779 (C2) HDA temperature 187 187 240518758432 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	68.3% Good	Read 118 Write 120 Mixed 84.1 80% 107 MB/s	4K Read 0.64 4K Write 1.41 4K Mixed 0.31 87% 0.78 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 68.3% Great: 74%
Hitachi HDS721032CLA362 320GB-$150 10,092 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 205GB free Firmware: JPFOA3MA Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 126 126 134 (03) Spinup time 119 119 12897419457 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 2203 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 140 140 30 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 5517 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1530 (C0) Power-off retract count 99 99 2212 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 99 99 2212 (C2) HDA temperature 187 187 180389281824 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	49.2% Average	Read 92.9 Write 78.6 Mixed 84.9 64% 85.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.39 4K Write 1.23 4K Mixed 0.24 66% 0.62 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 49.2% Great: 50%
TDK LoR Classic USB 3.0 32GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 11% 29GB free, PID 069d, tdk Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	7.78% Terrible	Read 26.2 Write 13.4 Mixed 21.2 24% 20.3 MB/s	4K Read 4.44 4K Write 0.004 4K Mixed 0.006 17% 1.48 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 7.78% Great: 16%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x2GB 183,252 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR2 Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	27.4% Poor	MC Read 10.8 MC Write 6.6 MC Mixed 9.9 26% 9.1 GB/s	SC Read 6.6 SC Write 5.2 SC Mixed 6.8 18% 6.2 GB/s	Latency 76.7 52% 76.7 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 27.4% Great: 45%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical A85GM Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 55%

Yacht

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Foxconn A85GM

CPU
Athlon II X4 645AMDBench 46%, 5,346 samples	1x
Athlon II X4 640AMD $70Bench 45%, 18,839 samples	1x
Phenom 9750AMDBench 44%, 1,906 samples	1x

GPU
R9 280AMD $185Bench 30%, 33,175 samples	1x
Radeon HD 8490AMDBench 2%, 4,568 samples	1x
Radeon HD 4200ATIBench 1%, 10,090 samples	1x

SSD
PLUS 120GBSandiskBench 43%, 16,974 samples	1x

RAM
5GBUnknownBench 18%, 14,654 samples	1x
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	1x
3x2GBUnknownBench 30%, 45,030 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 38% - Below average

Total price: $185

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $285	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $238	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350