ECS GLKD-I2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.91% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive37.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardECS GLKD-I2  (all builds)
Memory1.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180205
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 18 '19 at 19:07
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium Silver J5005
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
43.6% Average
Memory 48.3
1-Core 58.9
2-Core 112
42% 73.2 Pts
4-Core 225
8-Core 228
30% 226 Pts
64-Core 202
12% 202 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 43.6%
Great: 45%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 605
Elitegroup(1019 A515) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 23.20.16.4905
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
2.91% Terrible
Lighting 3.63
Reflection 4.31
Parallax 3.44
3% 3.79 fps
MRender 2.57
Gravity 3.13
Splatting 4.22
3% 3.31 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.91%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 120GB
94GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UE4500RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 204 3.3 6.6 14 102 63 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
37.6% Below average
Read 388
Write 235
Mixed 198
SusWrite 65.6
49% 221 MB/s
4K Read 10.8
4K Write 31.7
4K Mixed 10.1
46% 17.5 MB/s
DQ Read 112
DQ Write 79.9
DQ Mixed 42
46% 77.8 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 37.6%
Great: 55%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 16GB
9GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.6 4.4 4.4 4.4 4.1 4.5 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
6.85% Terrible
Read 24
Write 2
Mixed 5.5
SusWrite 4.4
9% 8.98 MB/s
4K Read 7.6
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.4
49% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.85%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 76.B353G.D140B 1x4GB
1 of 1 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
24% Poor
MC Read 8.5
MC Write 9.5
MC Mixed 9.2
26% 9.07 GB/s
SC Read 2.8
SC Write 4.7
SC Mixed 4.1
11% 3.87 GB/s
Latency 167
24% 167 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 24%
Great: 40%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GLKD-I2 Builds (Compare 17 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 26%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: ECS GLKD-I2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 20% - Poor Total price: $14
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $158
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback