Intel CRESCENTBAY

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.19% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive74.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
MotherboardIntel CRESCENTBAY  (all builds)
Memory0.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150829
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateAug 07 '16 at 19:36
Run Duration216 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5500U
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
54.8% Above average
Memory 82.5
1-Core 85.4
2-Core 80.9
56% 82.9 Pts
4-Core 157
8-Core 179
22% 168 Pts
64-Core 196
12% 196 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 54.8%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)
Intel(8086 1616) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4331
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
4.19% Terrible
Lighting 4.93
Reflection 4.04
Parallax 5.91
4% 4.96 fps
MRender 4.14
Gravity 4.87
Splatting 6.87
4% 5.29 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.19%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk X300 MSATA 256GB
171GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X3520012 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
74.1% Very good
Read 477
Write 338
Mixed 349
86% 388 MB/s
4K Read 24.1
4K Write 81.1
4K Mixed 15.5
99% 40.2 MB/s
DQ Read 30.2
DQ Write 218
DQ Mixed 16.7
45% 88.4 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 74.1%
Great: 90%
Biwin SSD 64GB
9GB free
Firmware: O0529A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
54.8% Above average
Read 496
Write 153
Mixed 236
64% 295 MB/s
4K Read 17.6
4K Write 70.1
4K Mixed 3.21
68% 30.3 MB/s
DQ Read 159
DQ Write 156
DQ Mixed 18.7
52% 111 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 54.8%
Great: 67%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2010)-$40
229GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
38.4% Below average
Read 64.6
Write 69
Mixed 66.3
50% 66.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.45
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.21
71% 0.75 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 38.4%
Great: 50%
TOSHIBA DT01ACA200 2TB
1TB free, PID 2352
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
21.4% Poor
Read 39.1
Write 41.4
Mixed 13.5
38% 31.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.04
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.22
83% 1.12 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 21.4%
Great: 21%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B1G73QHO-YKO 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
22.4% Poor
MC Read 7
MC Write 7.6
MC Mixed 6.7
20% 7.1 GB/s
SC Read 6.4
SC Write 3.7
SC Mixed 5.5
15% 5.2 GB/s
Latency 76.1
52% 76.1 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 22.4%
Great: 36%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CRESCENTBAY Builds (Compare 195 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel CRESCENTBAY

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback