| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 0.94% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Very high background CPU (64%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus P8H61-M LE (all builds) |
| Memory | 0.8 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20110510 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Feb 16 '19 at 15:00 |
| Run Duration | 122 Seconds |
| Run User | GRC-User |
| Background CPU | 64% |
PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
59.5%
Above average
|
63% 102 Pts
|
24% 179 Pts
|
12% 201 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Intel HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)
Asus(1043 844D) 785MB
Driver: igdumd32.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4229
|
0.94%
Terrible
|
1% 4.65 fps
|
1% 1.22 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23
352GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 101 95 104 50 92 MB/s
|
57.7%
Above average
|
63% 85.2 MB/s
|
145% 1.07 MB/s
| |
|
SAMSUNG HM320II 320GB
132GB free, PID 022b
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 24 23 24 23 23 MB/s
|
13.6%
Very poor
|
29% 21.5 MB/s
|
80% 0.93 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston 9905471-001.A01LF 1x2GB
1 of 2 slots used
2GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
|
28%
Poor
|
25% 8.73 GB/s
|
23% 8.2 GB/s
|
59% 67.9 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical P8H61-M LE Builds (Compare 1,014 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus P8H61-M LE - $134
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i3-2100Intel $49Bench 51%, 63,701 samples | 163x |
| Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples | 110x |
| Core i5-2500IntelBench 63%, 82,538 samples | 83x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 158x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 79x |
| GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples | 35x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 60% - Good | Total price: $211 |