HP Z600 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics4.27% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive61.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Z600 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0B54h
Memory19.2 GB free of 24.002 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111102
Uptime1.4 Days
Run DateFeb 16 '19 at 08:46
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User SVN-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon X5650
CPU0 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
71.4% Very good
Memory 91.5
1-Core 67.4
2-Core 152
63% 104 Pts
4-Core 278
8-Core 428
44% 353 Pts
64-Core 437
27% 437 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 71.4%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 230
Device(1B0A 9044) 1.5GB
Ram: 1.5GB, Driver: 341.74
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
4.27% Terrible
Lighting 5.77
Reflection 5.96
Parallax 2.03
5% 4.59 fps
MRender 4
Gravity 4.53
Splatting 4.04
3% 4.19 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.27%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
128GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 219 217 215 214 194 189 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
61.1% Good
Read 217
Write 232
Mixed 204
SusWrite 208
49% 215 MB/s
4K Read 22.8
4K Write 48.9
4K Mixed 30
99% 33.9 MB/s
DQ Read 203
DQ Write 192
DQ Mixed 197
148% 198 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 61.1%
Great: 124%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$20
44GB free
Firmware: HP73
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 112 113 110 113 114 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
69.9% Good
Read 132
Write 72
Mixed 63
SusWrite 112
70% 94.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
140% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 69.9%
Great: 88%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$20
153GB free
Firmware: HP73
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 115 118 116 119 118 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
49.9% Average
Read 57.9
Write 14.7
Mixed 22.4
SusWrite 114
38% 52.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 5.8
4K Mixed 0.4
181% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 49.9%
Great: 88%
PLATINUM My Drive 2.5'' 500GB
127GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 25 26 26 26 26 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
15.4% Very poor
Read 28.7
Write 27
Mixed 24
SusWrite 25.5
36% 26.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
90% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 15.4%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:80 2C 36KSF1G72PZ-1G4M1 ID:80 2C 36KSF1G72PZ-1G4M1 ID:80 2C 36KSF1G72PZ-1G4M1 58GB
1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 34816 MB
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
51.4% Above average
MC Read 18.6
MC Write 15.8
MC Mixed 21
53% 18.5 GB/s
SC Read 10.8
SC Write 10.2
SC Mixed 11.6
31% 10.9 GB/s
Latency 64.9
62% 64.9 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z600 Workstation Builds (Compare 2,180 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

System: HP Z600 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback