Performance Results


Gaming 10% Tree trunk	Desktop 65% Destroyer	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	6.33% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	33.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2920XM 906 User benchmarks, average bench 62% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	66.8% Good	Memory 84.2 1-Core 87 2-Core 160 66% 111 Pts	4-Core 268 8-Core 417 42% 342 Pts	64-Core 422 26% 422 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 66.8% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 3000M 2,560 User benchmarks, average bench 6% Dell(1028 14A4) 2GB CLim: 450 MHz, MLim: 625 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 369.9 Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	6.33% Terrible	Lighting 7.2 Reflection 8.58 Parallax 6.12 6% 7.3 fps	MRender 10 Gravity 7.2 Splatting 9.22 7% 8.81 fps
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 6.33% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Micron C400 RealSSD mSATA 128GB-$159 644 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 73GB free (System drive) Firmware: 000F SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 27 28 28 27 28 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	33.6% Below average	Read 238 Write 28 Mixed 53.8 SusWrite 27.3 19% 86.9 MB/s	4K Read 19.6 4K Write 28 4K Mixed 13.8 62% 20.5 MB/s	DQ Read 140 DQ Write 28.1 DQ Mixed 28.9 35% 65.7 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 33.6% Great: 62%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 500GB 13,939 User benchmarks, average bench 179% 442GB free Firmware: 1.0. SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 98 98 98 98 98 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	78.5% Very good	Read 833 Write 95.3 Mixed 150 SusWrite 96.1 63% 294 MB/s	4K Read 28.4 4K Write 74.8 4K Mixed 21.8 110% 41.7 MB/s	DQ Read 192 DQ Write 100 DQ Mixed 40 58% 111 MB/s
Poor: 82% ↑ This bench: 78.5% Great: 313%
Apacer Portable HDD 500GB 65 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 461GB free, PID c004 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 114 115 115 115 115 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	44.9% Average	Read 109 Write 108 Mixed 35.3 SusWrite 111 120% 90.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.6 77% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 44.9% Great: 45%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5173QH0-YK0 M471B1G73DB0-YK0 M471B5173QH0-YK0 M471B1G73DB0-YK0 24GB 21 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 8192, 4096, 8192 MB Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	53.4% Above average	MC Read 18.2 MC Write 20 MC Mixed 17.1 53% 18.4 GB/s	SC Read 15.5 SC Write 16.6 SC Mixed 16.9 47% 16.3 GB/s	Latency 73.1 55% 73.1 ns
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 53.4% Great: 55%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 56%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

GPU
Quadro 3000MNvidiaBench 6%, 2,560 samples	238x
Quadro 4000MNvidiaBench 8%, 1,114 samples	91x
HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 110,588 samples	89x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	12x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	11x
PM830 mSATA 256GBSamsungBench 63%, 9,379 samples	8x

RAM
M471B5273DH0-CH9 2x4GBSamsungBench 43%, 15,815 samples	15x
HMT351S6CFR8C-H9 4x4GBHynixBench 45%, 359 samples	15x
HMT451S6MFR8C-PB HMT351S6BFR8C-H9 HMT451S6MFR8C-PB HMT351S6BFR8C-H9 16GBHynixBench 45%, 20 samples	13x

Value: 65% - Good

Total price: $113

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16