Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

ADD TO PC
BUILD

Hasee PAF4

Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 59% Gunboat	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	6.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	61.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Hasee PAF4 (all builds)
Motherboard	Hasee A24Win8
Memory	4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit 种颜色,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20121108
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Feb 15 '19 at 17:15
Run Duration	128 Seconds
Run User	CHN-User
Background CPU	7%

PC Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3230M-$100 61,311 User benchmarks, average bench 49% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	55.9% Above average	Memory 82.2 1-Core 76.6 2-Core 126 59% 95.1 Pts	4-Core 174 8-Core 178 24% 176 Pts	64-Core 196 12% 196 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 55.9% Great: 58%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 645M 492 User benchmarks, average bench 6% Device(1B0A 20DC) 2GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 22.21.13.8205 Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	6.6% Terrible	Lighting 7.57 Reflection 6.81 Parallax 8 6% 7.46 fps	MRender 8.33 Gravity 8.97 Splatting 9.65 7% 8.98 fps
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 6.6% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 545s Series 128GB 2,701 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 88GB free (System drive) Firmware: LHF002C SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 130 131 131 131 131 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	61.8% Good	Read 459 Write 164 Mixed 195 SusWrite 131 52% 237 MB/s	4K Read 19.9 4K Write 45.3 4K Mixed 26 88% 30.4 MB/s	DQ Read 216 DQ Write 152 DQ Mixed 150 121% 172 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 61.8% Great: 90%
Seagate ST500LM012 HN-M500MBB 500GB 47,588 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 175GB free Firmware: 2AR10001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 79 78 79 80 79 MB/s Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	49.6% Average	Read 95.5 Write 26 Mixed 42.5 SusWrite 77.7 44% 60.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.3 65% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 49.6% Great: 59%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5273DH0-CH9 Hynix HMT351S6CFR8C-H9 8GB 369 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	49.9% Average	MC Read 17.4 MC Write 17.9 MC Mixed 16.1 49% 17.1 GB/s	SC Read 15.3 SC Write 15.4 SC Mixed 15.8 44% 15.5 GB/s	Latency 76.6 52% 76.6 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 49.9% Great: 52%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback