HP Compaq 8200 Elite CMT PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (93rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 7 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics45.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP Compaq 8200 Elite CMT PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1494
Memory13.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110609
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 12 '19 at 21:35
Run Duration106 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
73.8% Very good
Memory 85.8
1-Core 95.7
2-Core 188
72% 123 Pts
4-Core 359
8-Core 358
48% 358 Pts
64-Core 356
22% 356 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 73.8%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX 580
Dell(1028 1701) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1266 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.1.1
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
45.2% Average
Lighting 54
Reflection 64.8
Parallax 81.6
44% 66.8 fps
MRender 64.8
Gravity 57.7
Splatting 53.7
48% 58.7 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 45.2%
Great: 42%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD10EURX 1TB-$26
739GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 118 101 135 135 142 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
80.5% Excellent
Read 155
Write 149
Mixed 85.5
SusWrite 125
94% 129 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.9
177% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 80.5%
Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351U6BFR8C-H9 1333EL Series 1333EL Series 16GB
1067, 1067, 1067, 1067 MHz
4096, 8192, 2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
30.8% Below average
MC Read 10.4
MC Write 10.5
MC Mixed 8.3
28% 9.73 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 10.7
SC Mixed 9
28% 9.7 GB/s
Latency 71.4
56% 71.4 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 30.8%
Great: 37%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq 8200 Elite CMT PC Builds (Compare 1,780 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 8200 Elite CMT PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $278
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback