Today's hottest deals

Asus P9X79 PRO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Memory22GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 22GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P9X79 PRO  (all builds)
Memory19.1 GB free of 22 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140725
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 03 '16 at 09:44
Run Duration262 Seconds
Run User EST-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4820K-$110
LGA2011, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
87.1% Excellent
Memory 93.4
1-Core 125
2-Core 250
88% 156 Pts
4-Core 437
8-Core 632
67% 534 Pts
64-Core 632
39% 632 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 87.1%
Great: 81%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$112
114GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 71% Great: 124%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$37
255GB free
Firmware: 15.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
65.2% Good
Read 115
Write 112
Mixed 114
86% 114 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.99
4K Mixed 0.45
116% 1.05 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 65.2%
Great: 69%
WD 423AS External 750GB
167GB free, PID 1003
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
6.01% Terrible
Read 1.48
Write 19
Mixed 10.4
16% 10.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.14
4K Write 0.53
4K Mixed 0.13
23% 0.26 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.01%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-14900CL10-8GBX F3-14900CL10-8GBX Kingston 99U5471-001.A00LF CT51264BA160BJ.M8 22GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192, 2048, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
61.5% Good
MC Read 23.5
MC Write 20.8
MC Mixed 20.9
62% 21.7 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 13.5
46% 16.1 GB/s
Latency 61.3
65% 61.3 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 61.5%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P9X79 PRO Builds (Compare 1,455 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 53%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus P9X79 PRO - $374

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $899
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback