Asus G20CB

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics54.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus G20CB  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK G20CB
Memory1.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150828
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 09 '19 at 17:57
Run Duration243 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6400-$79
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
74% Very good
Memory 83.6
1-Core 95
2-Core 192
71% 123 Pts
4-Core 372
8-Core 377
50% 374 Pts
64-Core 376
23% 376 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 74%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 6GB
MSI(1462 328F) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 416.94
Performing below potential (42nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
54.8% Above average
Lighting 68.7
Reflection 71.8
Parallax 68.4
56% 69.6 fps
MRender 66
Gravity 63.2
Splatting 63.3
52% 64.2 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 54.8%
Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 480GB-$175
56GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C3J96R9
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 4,277
Write 59.2
Mixed 117
309% 1,484 MB/s
4K Read 574
4K Write 3.6
4K Mixed 7.4
881% 195 MB/s
Poor: 50% Great: 92%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 1TB-$68
931GB free
Firmware: CC41
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 92.5
Write 153
Mixed 31.2
67% 92.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 2.2
395% 2.9 MB/s
Poor: 48% Great: 112%
Seagate Expansion 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: 9300
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 60 63 63 63 64 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
51.2% Above average
Read 115
Write 94.2
Mixed 62.2
SusWrite 62.1
61% 83.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 1
227% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 51.2%
Great: 67%
Seagate Expansion 1TB
470GB free
Firmware: 0636
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 44 44 44 44 46 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
37.4% Below average
Read 86
Write 70
Mixed 50.2
SusWrite 44
46% 62.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
160% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 37.4%
Great: 66%
WD Elements 107C 3TB
1.5TB free, PID 107c
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 111
Write 119
Mixed 82.3
133% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
119% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 15% Great: 58%
H/W DISK 2 6TB
164GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 110
Write 106
Mixed 74.7
121% 96.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
119% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 22% Great: 71%
WD Elements 10B8 3TB
3TB free, PID 10b8
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 120 121 121 121 120 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
47.8% Average
Read 117
Write 117
Mixed 105
SusWrite 119
157% 115 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
85% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 47.8%
Great: 49%
H/W DISK 3 6TB
39GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 45 46 45 45 45 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
38.1% Below average
Read 148
Write 150
Mixed 83.3
SusWrite 45.7
137% 107 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
105% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 38.1%
Great: 63%
WD My Passport 25E2 4TB
3.5TB free, PID 25e2
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 76 79 80 81 80 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
56.9% Above average
Read 128
Write 108
Mixed 72.2
SusWrite 78.2
125% 96.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 6.8
4K Mixed 0.7
260% 2.97 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 56.9%
Great: 59%
H/W DISK 1 2TB
115GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.2 7.2 1.8 1 0.1 2.1 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
15.1% Very poor
Read 57.2
Write 53.3
Mixed 41.5
SusWrite 3.4
49% 38.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.6
88% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 15.1%
Great: 49%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA41GS6AFR8N-TF 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
38.6% Below average
MC Read 13.5
MC Write 13.3
MC Mixed 11.7
37% 12.8 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 12.9
SC Mixed 11.4
34% 11.8 GB/s
Latency 74.2
54% 74.2 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 38.6%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical G20CB Builds (Compare 998 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 51%
Yacht

System: Asus G20CB

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $448
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback