HP Compaq 8200 Elite CMT PC

Performance Results


Gaming 24% Surfboard	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 20% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	32.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	HP Compaq 8200 Elite CMT PC (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 1494
Memory	28.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110609
Uptime	0.9 Days
Run Date	Feb 07 '19 at 20:10
Run Duration	212 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	8%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2600-$188 185,630 User benchmarks, average bench 67% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	66.5% Good	Memory 81.2 1-Core 92.1 2-Core 185 69% 119 Pts	4-Core 281 8-Core 452 45% 366 Pts	64-Core 453 28% 453 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 66.5% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% EVGA(3842 6253) CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 1757 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 417.35 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	32.1% Below average	Lighting 39.9 Reflection 32 Parallax 38.2 32% 36.7 fps	MRender 38 Gravity 39.1 Splatting 37.4 31% 38.2 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 32.1% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX100 256GB-$116 55,768 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 48GB free Firmware: MU01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 222 227 228 227 228 228 MB/s Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	59.4% Above average	Read 240 Write 217 Mixed 195 SusWrite 227 50% 220 MB/s	4K Read 21.1 4K Write 44.4 4K Mixed 26.7 90% 30.7 MB/s	DQ Read 168 DQ Write 193 DQ Mixed 146 120% 169 MB/s
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 59.4% Great: 97%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$20 496,077 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 72GB free (System drive) Firmware: 18.01H18 SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 43 57 53 62 68 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	45.2% Average	Read 106 Write 99.2 Mixed 68.5 SusWrite 51.9 60% 81.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 1 170% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 45.2% Great: 69%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$32 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 109GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 163 164 164 165 165 MB/s Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	94.2% Outstanding	Read 164 Write 161 Mixed 86.9 SusWrite 164 105% 144 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 1.2 244% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 94.2% Great: 109%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 6TB 10,357 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 4TB free Firmware: D781 SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 17 17 17 17 17 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	12% Very poor	Read 23.6 Write 16.8 Mixed 20.8 SusWrite 16.7 14% 19.5 MB/s	4K Read 2 4K Write 3 4K Mixed 0.6 206% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 12% Great: 90%
Seagate Expansion 4TB 22,017 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 399GB free Firmware: 0707 SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 29 29 30 30 30 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	16.7% Very poor	Read 27.6 Write 21.9 Mixed 24.4 SusWrite 29.4 19% 25.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 3.7 4K Mixed 0.6 168% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 16.7% Great: 66%
Philips USB Flash Drive 32GB 300 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 24GB free, PID 4200 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Read 5.5 Mixed 5.3 6% 5.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 0% 0.03 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 10%
ADATA HD650 4TB 145 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 3.5TB free, PID a35a Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 15 15 15 15 15 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	16.7% Very poor	Read 20.4 Write 19.1 Mixed 19.9 SusWrite 15.3 25% 18.7 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 3.3 4K Mixed 0.7 140% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 16.7% Great: 60%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B1G73QH0-CK0 Hynix HMT41GU6BFR8C-PB Corsair CMX8GX3M1A1333C9 Corsair CMV8GX3M1A1600C11 32GB 12 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 1067, 1067, 1067, 1067 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	39.2% Below average	MC Read 13.7 MC Write 13.3 MC Mixed 11.7 37% 12.9 GB/s	SC Read 12.1 SC Write 14.3 SC Mixed 13.2 38% 13.2 GB/s	Latency 78.4 51% 78.4 ns
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 39.2% Great: 40%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Compaq 8200 Elite CMT PC Builds (Compare 1,769 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 57%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 8200 Elite CMT PC

CPU
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples	686x
Core i7-2600Intel $188Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	597x
Core i5-2500IntelBench 63%, 82,538 samples	315x

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	423x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	141x
GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples	86x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	55x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	33x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	30x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	22x
HMT351U7BFR8C-H9 HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 HMT351U7BFR8C-H9 HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 16GBHynixBench 49%, 20 samples	14x
M378B5773DH0-CH9 2x2GBSamsungBench 45%, 4,605 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 58% - Above average

Total price: $278

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $289	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16