Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 16% Surfboard	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 18%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	0.26% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (87%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel U7300 1,665 User benchmarks, average bench 30% CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.3 GHz Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	18% Very poor	Memory 30.7 1-Core 15 2-Core 29.6 17% 25.1 Pts	4-Core 32.2 8-Core 32.4 4% 32.3 Pts	64-Core 32.6 2% 32.6 Pts
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 18% Great: 36%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel Mobile Series 4 Express Chipset Family 23,924 User benchmarks, average bench 0% Acer(1025 029B) 1.8GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.1892 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.26% Terrible	Lighting 0.33 Reflection 0.31 Parallax 0.31 0% 0.32 fps	MRender 0.19 Gravity 0.23 Splatting 0.43 0% 0.29 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.26% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 320GB (2009)-$79 42,987 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 245GB free (System drive) Firmware: 11.01A11 SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 50 53 53 51 51 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	29.2% Poor	Read 50 Write 36.5 Mixed 32.8 SusWrite 51.2 31% 42.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.9 158% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 29.2% Great: 41%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown EBE21UE8AFSA-8G-F 2x2GB 72 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR2 800 MHz Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	10.8% Very poor	MC Read 4.1 MC Write 3.4 MC Mixed 3.3 10% 3.6 GB/s	SC Read 3 SC Write 3.5 SC Mixed 2.8 9% 3.1 GB/s	Latency 251 16% 251 ns
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 10.8% Great: 17%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 29%

Raft

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core2 Solo U3500IntelBench 28%, 486 samples	1x
U7300IntelBench 30%, 1,665 samples	1x

GPU
Mobile Series 4 Express Chipset FamilyIntelBench 0%, 23,924 samples	2x

SSD
Ultra II 240GBSanDisk $40Bench 82%, 53,931 samples	1x

RAM
EBE21UE8AFSA-8G-F 2x2GBUnknownBench 13%, 72 samples	1x
M4 70T5663QZ3-CE6 M4 70T5663EH3-CE6 4GBSamsungBench 13%, 4 samples	1x

Value: 20% - Poor

Total price: $40