HP Compaq dc7600 Convertible Minitower

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 30%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.09% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 4GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Compaq dc7600 Convertible Minitower  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 09F0h
Memory1.7 GB free of 4.00098 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20050518
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 04 '19 at 14:59
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium D 3.00GHz-$98
XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
32.9% Below average
Memory 58.5
1-Core 24
2-Core 45.5
30% 42.7 Pts
4-Core 45.7
8-Core 42.8
6% 44.2 Pts
64-Core 42.4
3% 42.4 Pts
Poor: 15%
This bench: 32.9%
Great: 37%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 5400
PwrHis(1787 3000) 1GB
Driver: aticfx32.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.09% Terrible
Lighting 1.33
Reflection 1.73
Parallax 1.59
1% 1.55 fps
MRender 1.62
Gravity 0.83
Splatting 1.52
1% 1.32 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.09%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Momentus Thin 5400.9 2.5" 320GB-$54
86GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 50 68 72 75 80 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
42.6% Average
Read 81
Write 77.9
Mixed 42.5
SusWrite 67.4
49% 67.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.6
104% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 42.6%
Great: 50%
Samsung HD642JJ 640GB-$69
316GB free
Firmware: 1AA01113
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 97 97 97 96 96 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
55.8% Above average
Read 97.5
Write 99.2
Mixed 60.3
SusWrite 96.6
65% 88.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1.1
192% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 63%
Generic Storage Device 4GB
4GB free, PID 1336
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
1.01% Terrible
Read 0.7
Write 0.7
Mixed 0.7
SusWrite 0.9
1% 0.75 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.4
22% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.01%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 37GB
null MHz
1024, 1024, 1024, 1024, 33792 MB
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
12.4% Very poor
MC Read 4.6
MC Write 3.6
MC Mixed 3.9
12% 4.03 GB/s
SC Read 1.5
SC Write 3.5
SC Mixed 1.8
6% 2.27 GB/s
Latency 132
30% 132 ns
Poor: 9%
This bench: 12.4%
Great: 22%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq dc7600 Convertible Minitower Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq dc7600 Convertible Minitower

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback