HP Z400 Workstation

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.86% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 8GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Z400 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0B4Ch
Memory4.7 GB free of 8.00195 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111102
Uptime2.4 Days
Run DateFeb 04 '19 at 07:29
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User KEN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon W3680-$180
CPU0 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.35 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
79% Very good
Memory 93.2
1-Core 84.1
2-Core 178
70% 119 Pts
4-Core 350
8-Core 512
54% 431 Pts
64-Core 498
31% 498 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 79%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro FX 1800
Nvidia(10DE 062C) 768MB
Ram: 768MB, Driver: 341.74
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
3.86% Terrible
Lighting 4.7
Reflection 6.42
Parallax 1.66
4% 4.26 fps
MRender 7.05
Gravity 3.43
Splatting 4.22
4% 4.9 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.86%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MG03SCA100 1TB
749GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5701
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 20 30 36 38 32 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
38% Below average
Read 102
Write 16.9
Mixed 42.3
SusWrite 30.1
36% 47.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.6
94% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 38%
Great: 92%
USB Flash Disk 32GB
17GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.3 7.4 6.7 8.5 6.5 7.2 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
5.15% Terrible
Read 19.5
Write 3.5
Mixed 7
SusWrite 7.1
10% 9.27 MB/s
4K Read 3.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
12% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.15%
Great: 27%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:02 FE EBJ21EE8BDFA-DJ-F ID:02 FE EBJ21EE8BDFA-DJ-F ID:02 FE EBJ21EE8BDFA-DJ-F ID:02 FE EBJ21EE8BDFA-DJ-F 42GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 34816 MB
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
42.6% Average
MC Read 16.3
MC Write 15.6
MC Mixed 11.4
41% 14.4 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 9.6
SC Mixed 12.1
31% 10.9 GB/s
Latency 61.6
65% 61.6 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 42.6%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z400 Workstation Builds (Compare 3,352 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP Z400 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $258
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback