HP All-in-One 24-f0xx

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 23%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics2.12% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP All-in-One 24-f0xx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8431
Memory4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181207
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 01 '19 at 20:46
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium Silver J5005
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
27.1% Poor
Memory 35.6
1-Core 17.5
2-Core 38.8
20% 30.6 Pts
4-Core 100
8-Core 229
19% 165 Pts
64-Core 232
14% 232 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 27.1%
Great: 45%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 605
HP(103C 8431) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 22.20.16.4836
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
2.12% Terrible
Lighting 2.37
Reflection 3.04
Parallax 2.25
2% 2.55 fps
MRender 2.86
Gravity 2.17
Splatting 3.78
2% 2.94 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.12%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$24
662GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPH4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 156 153 169 178 179 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
98.2% Outstanding
Read 180
Write 177
Mixed 74.8
SusWrite 163
108% 149 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.7
115% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 98.2%
Great: 112%
TO Exter nal USB 3.0 1TB
741GB free
Firmware: 0204
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 23 23 23 23 23 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
17.1% Very poor
Read 35.9
Write 40.1
Mixed 34.5
SusWrite 23
25% 33.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
127% 1 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 17.1%
Great: 81%
Hitachi HTS54755 500GB
327GB free, PID 1068
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 19 19 19 20 20 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
12.4% Very poor
Read 36.5
Write 26.2
Mixed 24.7
SusWrite 19.2
34% 26.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.5
50% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12.4%
Great: 22%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CTD 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 2666 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
23.7% Poor
MC Read 9.2
MC Write 9.7
MC Mixed 9.2
27% 9.37 GB/s
SC Read 2.4
SC Write 3
SC Mixed 2.7
8% 2.7 GB/s
Latency 224
18% 224 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 23.7%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical All-in-One 24-f0xx Builds (Compare 519 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP All-in-One 24-f0xx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback