Gigabyte B450 AORUS PRO WIFI

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 88%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics105% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGigabyte B450 AORUS PRO WIFI
MotherboardGigabyte B450 AORUS PRO WIFI  (all builds)
Memory23.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180615
Uptime4 Days
Run DateJan 29 '19 at 22:17
Run Duration186 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
85.2% Excellent
Memory 76.9
1-Core 132
2-Core 256
85% 155 Pts
4-Core 501
8-Core 908
85% 704 Pts
64-Core 1,363
84% 1,363 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 85.2%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 417.35
Performing below potential (67th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
105% Outstanding
Lighting 132
Reflection 125
Parallax 128
108% 128 fps
MRender 171
Gravity 126
Splatting 99.9
104% 132 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 105%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$104
17GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,279
Write 1,140
Mixed 970
251% 1,130 MB/s
4K Read 47.4
4K Write 118
4K Mixed 56.7
207% 74 MB/s
DQ Read 970
DQ Write 898
DQ Mixed 955
711% 941 MB/s
Poor: 160% Great: 280%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
108GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,364
Write 2,126
Mixed 1,582
450% 2,024 MB/s
4K Read 51.2
4K Write 139
4K Mixed 74.8
247% 88.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,134
DQ Write 934
DQ Mixed 1,062
788% 1,043 MB/s
Poor: 199% Great: 340%
Seagate IronWolf 3TB (2016)-$114
186GB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 79 79 81 77 80 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
49.1% Average
Read 92
Write 89
Mixed 62
SusWrite 78.9
59% 80.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
137% 1 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 49.1%
Great: 104%
Seagate IronWolf 3TB (2016)-$114
2.5TB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 170 171 171 172 170 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
95.8% Outstanding
Read 164
Write 161
Mixed 80.3
SusWrite 170
105% 144 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 95.8%
Great: 104%
Generic MassStorageClass 128GB
11GB free, PID 0746
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 99 99 99 99 99 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
54.5% Above average
Read 180
Write 65.5
Mixed 28
SusWrite 97.9
107% 92.8 MB/s
4K Read 11.9
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 1.1
129% 4.8 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 54.5%
Great: 55%
TOSHIBA TransMemory 16GB
9GB free, PID 6544
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.3 4 3.9 3.8 3.9 3.9 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
7.93% Terrible
Read 37
Write 3.5
Mixed 10
SusWrite 4.1
13% 13.6 MB/s
4K Read 7.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
26% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 7.93%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3000 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
75% Very good
MC Read 28.1
MC Write 26.4
MC Mixed 24.9
76% 26.5 GB/s
SC Read 21.7
SC Write 28.5
SC Mixed 24.4
71% 24.9 GB/s
Latency 86.4
46% 86.4 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 75%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-B450 AORUS PRO WIFI-CF Builds (Compare 7,410 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 124%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 117%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte B450 AORUS PRO WIFI - $140

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $873
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback