Asrock AB350M-HDV

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics43% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive246% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock AB350M-HDV  (all builds)
Memory4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181220
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 26 '19 at 16:46
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU10%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 1200-$100
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
65.4% Good
Memory 56.5
1-Core 111
2-Core 223
69% 130 Pts
4-Core 430
8-Core 419
57% 424 Pts
64-Core 432
27% 432 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 65.4%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
CLim: 1244 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.1.2
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
43% Average
Lighting 51.5
Reflection 63
Parallax 66.6
42% 60.4 fps
MRender 62.2
Gravity 51.3
Splatting 53
45% 55.5 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 43%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$95
110GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 646 329 326 330 333 329 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
246% Outstanding
Read 2,480
Write 1,468
Mixed 1,055
SusWrite 382
297% 1,346 MB/s
4K Read 63.1
4K Write 156
4K Mixed 80
281% 99.6 MB/s
DQ Read 862
DQ Write 764
DQ Mixed 789
598% 805 MB/s
Poor: 160%
This bench: 246%
Great: 280%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
411GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 149 148 151 151 151 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
85.7% Excellent
Read 148
Write 150
Mixed 110
SusWrite 150
103% 139 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.1
229% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 85.7%
Great: 109%
JetFlash Transcend 2GB
2GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.3 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.4 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
6.35% Terrible
Read 18.7
Write 6.2
Mixed 4.2
SusWrite 6.4
10% 8.88 MB/s
4K Read 9.5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
35% 3.17 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.35%
Great: 6%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CRC 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
56.7% Above average
MC Read 21.8
MC Write 20
MC Mixed 19.1
58% 20.3 GB/s
SC Read 15.6
SC Write 21.2
SC Mixed 18.8
53% 18.5 GB/s
Latency 138
29% 138 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 56.7%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical AB350M-HDV Builds (Compare 395 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock AB350M-HDV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $197
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback