Today's hottest deals

Acer Aspire 5750

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 24%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.9% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAcer Aspire 5750  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer JE50_HR
Memory1 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110907
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateJan 25 '19 at 00:44
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (84th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-2310M-$80
CPU1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
55.7% Above average
Memory 87.9
1-Core 55.5
2-Core 96.4
53% 79.9 Pts
4-Core 140
8-Core 141
19% 141 Pts
64-Core 141
9% 141 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 55.7%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)
Acer(1025 0504) 819MB
Driver: igdumd32.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
1.9% Terrible
Lighting 2.07
Reflection 2.92
Parallax 1.38
2% 2.12 fps
MRender 2.48
Gravity 0.57
Splatting 4.74
2% 2.59 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.9%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2010)-$25
392GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 56 44 51 50 67 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
40.1% Average
Read 86.2
Write 80.7
Mixed 47.6
SusWrite 53.2
49% 66.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
124% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 40.1%
Great: 50%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Smart SH564568FH8NZPHSCR 1x2GB
1 of 4 slots used
2GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
27.9% Poor
MC Read 9.4
MC Write 8.4
MC Mixed 8
25% 8.6 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 9.4
SC Mixed 8.5
25% 8.9 GB/s
Latency 69.6
57% 69.6 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 27.9%
Great: 28%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire 5750 Builds (Compare 354 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire 5750

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $78
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback