Asus PRIME X299-A

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics58.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsus PRIME X299-A  (all builds)
Memory26.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180803
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 19 '19 at 19:25
Run Duration167 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU9%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9940X-$790
LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 28 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
87.9% Excellent
Memory 78.6
1-Core 132
2-Core 263
86% 158 Pts
4-Core 521
8-Core 999
90% 760 Pts
64-Core 2494
154% 2494 Pts
Poor: 78%
This bench: 87.9%
Great: 95%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Nvidia(10DE 11D7) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
58.2% Above average
Lighting 71.8
Reflection 76.6
Parallax 65.2
58% 71.2 fps
MRender 70.7
Gravity 70.5
Splatting 69.3
57% 70.2 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 58.2%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$220
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,767
Write 1,500
Mixed 1317
340% 1,528 MB/s
4K Read 36.4
4K Write 120
4K Mixed 70.2
208% 75.4 MB/s
DQ Read 898
DQ Write 625
DQ Mixed 770
573% 764 MB/s
Poor: 195% Great: 371%
WD Red 8TB (2017)-$243
5TB free
Firmware: 83.H0A83
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 32
Write 53.9
Mixed 42.1
32% 42.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.4
89% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 56% Great: 110%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$110
2.5TB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 164
Write 103
Mixed 99
91% 122 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.1
213% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 46% Great: 100%
WD Red 8TB (2017)-$243
5TB free
Firmware: 83.H0A83
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 23.8
Write 46.1
Mixed 39.7
28% 36.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.4
71% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 56% Great: 110%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G4D26BFSB.16FBD2 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
109% Outstanding
MC Read 39.5
MC Write 53.2
MC Mixed 39.8
126% 44.2 GB/s
SC Read 5.9
SC Write 18.9
SC Mixed 10
33% 11.6 GB/s
Latency 83.2
48% 83.2 ns
Poor: 79%
This bench: 109%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME X299-A Builds (Compare 1,282 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 93%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X299-A

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $640
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback