HP Elite 7300 Series MT

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics1.1% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive26.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Elite 7300 Series MT  (all builds)
MotherboardPEGATRON 2AB5
Memory6.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110905
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 19 '19 at 16:32
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 31%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
72.7% Very good
Memory 89.4
1-Core 84.4
2-Core 175
69% 116 Pts
4-Core 323
8-Core 333
44% 328 Pts
64-Core 325
20% 325 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 72.7%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 5400
XFX(1682 6000) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.1% Terrible
Lighting 1.33
Reflection 1.77
Parallax 1.59
1% 1.57 fps
MRender 1.67
Gravity 0.8
Splatting 1.57
1% 1.34 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.1%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
170GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0105A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 29 56 68 59 34 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
26.2% Poor
Read 344
Write 306
Mixed 212
SusWrite 56.6
51% 230 MB/s
4K Read 20.1
4K Write 5.4
4K Mixed 0.3
34% 8.6 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 26.2%
Great: 100%
Hitachi HDS721010CLA632 1TB-$105
931GB free
Firmware: JP4OA41A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 114 112 109 109 112 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
63.8% Good
Read 111
Write 108
Mixed 55.7
SusWrite 111
71% 96.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
127% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 63.8%
Great: 76%
Seagate FA GoFlex Desk 750GB
251GB free, PID 5070
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 27 27 27 27 27 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
13% Very poor
Read 29.5
Write 25.5
Mixed 22.6
SusWrite 26.7
35% 26.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.6
53% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
28.3% Poor
MC Read 9.1
MC Write 9.3
MC Mixed 8.1
25% 8.83 GB/s
SC Read 7.9
SC Write 8.3
SC Mixed 8.7
24% 8.3 GB/s
Latency 67.9
59% 67.9 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 28.3%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Elite 7300 Series MT Builds (Compare 250 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP Elite 7300 Series MT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $278
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback