Asus GX800VHK

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 95%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 82%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics106% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive294% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAsus GX800VHK  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK GX800VHK
Memory52.9 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171124
Uptime2.3 Days
Run DateJan 19 '19 at 05:27
Run Duration218 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7820HK
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
87.1% Excellent
Memory 89.8
1-Core 136
2-Core 252
89% 159 Pts
4-Core 454
8-Core 716
72% 585 Pts
64-Core 667
41% 667 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 87.1%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080 (Mobile)
Asus(1043 1870) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2602 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 417.35
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Lighting 137
Reflection 147
Parallax 137
112% 140 fps
MRender 114
Gravity 137
Splatting 109
98% 120 fps
Poor: 66%
This bench: 106%
Great: 104%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 1.5TB
178GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1008 927 872 884 857 823 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
294% Outstanding
Read 3,151
Write 1160
Mixed 796
SusWrite 895
328% 1,501 MB/s
4K Read 39.9
4K Write 109
4K Mixed 58.2
193% 69.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,350
DQ Write 1,076
DQ Mixed 1,100
854% 1,175 MB/s
Poor: 150%
This bench: 294%
Great: 407%
WD My Passport 25F3 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: 1012
SusWrite @10s intervals: 392 418 417 425 403 385 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
71.7% Very good
Read 398
Write 378
Mixed 298
SusWrite 407
84% 370 MB/s
4K Read 21.2
4K Write 37.2
4K Mixed 24.9
84% 27.8 MB/s
DQ Read 110
DQ Write 108
DQ Mixed 113
84% 110 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 71.7%
Great: 83%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 750GB (2010)-$70
11GB free
Firmware: 0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 111
Write 73.2
Mixed 30.5
52% 71.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.7
110% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 23% Great: 62%
SDXC Card 128GB
118GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 64 64 64 62 59 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
28.7% Poor
Read 79.5
Write 51.5
Mixed 60.5
SusWrite 60.2
82% 62.9 MB/s
4K Read 5.4
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 1.5
102% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 28.7%
Great: 45%
WD My Passport 25E2 4TB
2TB free, PID 25e2
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 88 87 86 86 85 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
35.3% Below average
Read 91.5
Write 101
Mixed 59.5
SusWrite 86.5
114% 84.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.1
39% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 35.3%
Great: 59%
WD My Passport 25E2 4TB
2TB free, PID 25e2
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 88 88 87 86 85 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
33.9% Below average
Read 87.8
Write 81.7
Mixed 57.3
SusWrite 86.2
105% 78.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.2
34% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 33.9%
Great: 59%
WD My Passport 25E2 4TB
3.5TB free, PID 25e2
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 112 110 112 109 108 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
49.5% Average
Read 98.3
Write 107
Mixed 74
SusWrite 110
133% 97.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 3.6
4K Mixed 0.7
150% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 49.5%
Great: 59%
Hitachi HTS722020K9SA00 200GB
51GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 12 11 12 11 11 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
11.4% Very poor
Read 37
Write 11.5
Mixed 15
SusWrite 11.4
21% 18.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
63% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.4%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 2800 C18 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
78.6% Very good
MC Read 27.5
MC Write 30.5
MC Mixed 25.8
80% 27.9 GB/s
SC Read 16.4
SC Write 30.9
SC Mixed 23.2
67% 23.5 GB/s
Latency 67.4
59% 67.4 ns
Poor: 74%
This bench: 78.6%
Great: 95%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GX800VHK Builds (Compare 15 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 73%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer

System: Asus GX800VHK

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback