Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 43% Speed boat	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	8.16% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (97%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon X4 750 (2013 D.Ri) 216 User benchmarks, average bench 54% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	44.4% Average	Memory 67.6 1-Core 39.3 2-Core 74.1 40% 60.3 Pts	4-Core 122 8-Core 145 17% 133 Pts	64-Core 171 11% 171 Pts
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 44.4% Great: 60%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 640 34,519 User benchmarks, average bench 6% Palit(1569 1282) 1GB CLim: 1045 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	8.16% Terrible	Lighting 10.4 Reflection 9 Parallax 10.7 8% 10 fps	MRender 12.1 Gravity 8.5 Splatting 7.96 8% 9.52 fps
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 8.16% Great: 7%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 228GB free (System drive) Firmware: CC47 SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 107 109 60 66 117 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	60.7% Good	Read 122 Write 140 Mixed 55.8 SusWrite 89.4 74% 102 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.7 136% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 60.7% Great: 112%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x4GB 154,807 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 800 MHz Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	21.5% Poor	MC Read 10.3 MC Write 4.2 MC Mixed 6.7 20% 7.07 GB/s	SC Read 6 SC Write 4.4 SC Mixed 7.2 17% 5.87 GB/s	Latency 107 37% 107 ns
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 21.5% Great: 52%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 13%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 11%

Tree trunk

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	5x
128GB 128GBSSDBench 65%, 7,332 samples	5x
PM830 mSATA 128GBSamsungBench 54%, 663 samples	4x

RAM
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	11x
1x4GBUnknownBench 28%, 154,807 samples	2x
BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. 8GBUnknownBench 40%, 643 samples	1x

Value: 55% - Above average

Total price: $147