Dell OptiPlex 5040

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics6.69% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive112% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemDell OptiPlex 5040
MotherboardDell OptiPlex 5040  (all builds)
Memory4.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180831
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJan 17 '19 at 13:41
Run Duration295 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700-$170
Socket 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
75.3% Very good
Memory 83.2
1-Core 107
2-Core 197
74% 129 Pts
4-Core 363
8-Core 628
60% 495 Pts
64-Core 612
38% 612 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 75.3%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)
Dell(1028 06BA) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 23.20.16.4973
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
6.69% Terrible
Lighting 7.07
Reflection 10.3
Parallax 7
6% 8.14 fps
MRender 9.29
Gravity 6.27
Splatting 14.1
8% 9.88 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.69%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB (2017)-$135
73GB free (System drive)
Firmware: B35900WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 204 189 155 182 177 206 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 931
Write 444
Mixed 303
SusWrite 186
102% 466 MB/s
4K Read 27.5
4K Write 85.5
4K Mixed 32.3
128% 48.4 MB/s
DQ Read 653
DQ Write 430
DQ Mixed 344
310% 476 MB/s
Poor: 86%
This bench: 112%
Great: 144%
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
296GB free
Firmware: SBFKB1E1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 313 224 243 316 212 310 MB/s
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
65.1% Good
Read 181
Write 96.5
Mixed 229
SusWrite 270
44% 194 MB/s
4K Read 21.2
4K Write 57.1
4K Mixed 26.5
96% 34.9 MB/s
DQ Read 252
DQ Write 274
DQ Mixed 209
172% 245 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 65.1%
Great: 102%
Samsung Spinpoint F4 2TB-$119
497GB free
Firmware: 1AQ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 91 96 109 96 110 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
43% Average
Read 56.2
Write 33.5
Mixed 40
SusWrite 93.2
41% 55.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
162% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 43%
Great: 72%
TCSUNBOW N8 240GB
139GB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 208 211 190 219 179 218 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
160% Outstanding
Read 231
Write 212
Mixed 214
SusWrite 204
292% 216 MB/s
4K Read 20.1
4K Write 25
4K Mixed 21.4
1,653% 22.2 MB/s
DQ Read 23.7
DQ Write 37.8
DQ Mixed 27.6
2,312% 29.7 MB/s
BUFFALO HD-WLU3/R1 1 3TB
1.5TB free, PID 01ce
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 60 46 53 44 56 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
38.6% Below average
Read 135
Write 136
Mixed 79
SusWrite 51.2
129% 100 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.1
126% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 38.6%
Great: 62%
BUFFALO HD-WLU3/R1 2 3TB
3TB free, PID 01ce
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 54 46 53 44 56 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
42.9% Average
Read 164
Write 164
Mixed 93
SusWrite 49.6
150% 118 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
126% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 42.9%
Great: 57%
WD My Book 25EE 4TB
976GB free, PID 25ee
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 100 82 98 78 96 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
46.4% Average
Read 127
Write 133
Mixed 101
SusWrite 90.6
152% 113 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
126% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 46.4%
Great: 100%
WD My Book 25EE 4TB
483GB free, PID 25ee
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 92 83 97 78 94 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
41.7% Average
Read 100
Write 96.7
Mixed 83.5
SusWrite 88.2
125% 92.2 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
123% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 41.7%
Great: 100%
BUFFALO HD-QLU3/R5 1 2TB
2TB free, PID 01cd
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 51 46 53 45 29 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
31.9% Below average
Read 100
Write 76
Mixed 54.2
SusWrite 46.4
88% 69.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
115% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 31.9%
Great: 32%
BUFFALO HD-QLU3/R5 2 2TB
582GB free, PID 01cd
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.6 1.4 1.3 1.2 1.6 25 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
20.5% Poor
Read 88.2
Write 37.3
Mixed 51.2
SusWrite 5.2
52% 45.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
104% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 20.5%
Great: 46%
BUFFALO HD-QLU3/R5 3 2TB
16GB free, PID 01cd
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 44 47 54 45 52 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
34.4% Below average
Read 126
Write 80.2
Mixed 70.5
SusWrite 49.4
101% 81.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
84% 1 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 34.4%
Great: 49%
BUFFALO HD-QLU3/R5 4 2TB
14GB free, PID 01cd
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.6 0.5 1.2 0.8 1 22 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
33.1% Below average
Read 185
Write 137
Mixed 81.7
SusWrite 4.3
120% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
84% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 33.1%
Great: 33%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451U6BFR8A-PB 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
57.2% Above average
MC Read 20.9
MC Write 21.2
MC Mixed 17.7
57% 19.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.6
SC Write 20.4
SC Mixed 18.4
50% 17.5 GB/s
Latency 74.8
54% 74.8 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 57.2%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical OptiPlex 5040 Builds (Compare 1,836 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Dell OptiPlex 5040

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $60
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback