Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (92nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 8 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	16.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-8100-$68 81,392 User benchmarks, average bench 71% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	83.2% Excellent	Memory 88.6 1-Core 116 2-Core 232 82% 145 Pts	4-Core 449 8-Core 452 60% 450 Pts	64-Core 453 28% 453 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 83.2% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030 185,384 User benchmarks, average bench 14% Gigabyte(1458 375C) 2GB; gigabyte CLim: 2113 MHz, MLim: 1874 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	16.9% Very poor	Lighting 20.6 Reflection 17 Parallax 20.1 17% 19.2 fps	MRender 20.4 Gravity 20.1 Splatting 21.7 17% 20.7 fps
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 16.9% Great: 15%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD WD5000AZLX-00K4KA0 500GB 44,506 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 4GB free (System drive) Firmware: 01.01A01 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 164 Write 162 Mixed 65 96% 130 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 1.1 212% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 40% Great: 104%
Samsung M2 Portable 320GB 89 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 222GB free, PID 60b2 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 41 41 41 41 41 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	20.2% Poor	Read 38.5 Write 18.3 Mixed 36.2 SusWrite 41.1 45% 33.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.8 90% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 20.2% Great: 20%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x8GB 168,538 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	39.8% Below average	MC Read 14.1 MC Write 13.9 MC Mixed 11.4 38% 13.1 GB/s	SC Read 12.4 SC Write 12.6 SC Mixed 11.6 35% 12.2 GB/s	Latency 68.9 58% 68.9 ns
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 39.8% Great: 67%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 51%

Yacht

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 42%

Speed boat

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 2x8GBCorsair $42Bench 76%, 105,447 samples	143x
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	127x
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $71Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	123x

Value: 106% - Outstanding

Total price: $416