Performance Results


Gaming 19% Surfboard	Desktop 76% Battleship	Workstation 16% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	18.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	69.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (83%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4430-$124 24,837 User benchmarks, average bench 65% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	73.4% Very good	Memory 91.8 1-Core 64.5 2-Core 174 65% 110 Pts	4-Core 319 8-Core 324 43% 322 Pts	64-Core 334 21% 334 Pts
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 73.4% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92 309,423 User benchmarks, average bench 17% Asus(1043 84BB) CLim: 1346 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 399.24 Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	18.8% Very poor	Lighting 23.7 Reflection 17.8 Parallax 21.2 19% 20.9 fps	MRender 26.4 Gravity 23.1 Splatting 17.7 18% 22.4 fps
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 18.8% Great: 19%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 500GB-$40 237,241 User benchmarks, average bench 106% 402GB free (System drive) Firmware: M3CR023 SusWrite @10s intervals: 219 215 214 217 216 224 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	69.2% Good	Read 253 Write 221 Mixed 231 SusWrite 218 52% 231 MB/s	4K Read 28 4K Write 54.3 4K Mixed 37.4 119% 39.9 MB/s	DQ Read 189 DQ Write 189 DQ Mixed 171 134% 183 MB/s
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 69.2% Great: 125%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x8GB 76 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	61.7% Good	MC Read 23 MC Write 23.3 MC Mixed 18.6 62% 21.6 GB/s	SC Read 14.4 SC Write 17.7 SC Mixed 20.3 50% 17.5 GB/s	Latency 64.4 62% 64.4 ns
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 61.7% Great: 62%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	478x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	229x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	227x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	70x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	59x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 1x8GBKingstonBench 31%, 37,489 samples	50x

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $288