Gigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 90%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 87%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 101%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics86.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive108% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO
MotherboardGigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO  (all builds)
Memory26.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180905
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 11 '19 at 17:33
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700K-$259
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Memory 91.2
1-Core 152
2-Core 269
95% 171 Pts
4-Core 598
8-Core 1,145
104% 871 Pts
64-Core 1,169
72% 1,169 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 101%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 417.35
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
86.9% Excellent
Lighting 110
Reflection 114
Parallax 96.8
89% 107 fps
MRender 98.4
Gravity 100
Splatting 102
82% 100 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 86.9%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
47GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 352 176 175 172 168 170 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 501
Write 487
Mixed 368
SusWrite 202
87% 389 MB/s
4K Read 44.3
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 57
194% 67.4 MB/s
DQ Read 375
DQ Write 337
DQ Mixed 356
267% 356 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 108%
Great: 124%
Asmedia ASMT1053 4TB
3TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 43 43 41 46 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
36.4% Below average
Read 76.1
Write 51.7
Mixed 14.2
SusWrite 50.9
35% 48.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.4
73% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 36.4%
Great: 72%
WDC WD40 EFRX-68N32N0 4TB
3.5TB free, PID 1153
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 27 27 26 26 27 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
14.1% Very poor
Read 24.5
Write 29.6
Mixed 17.9
SusWrite 26.3
34% 24.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
74% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14.1%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMU32GX4M2C3000C15 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
75.8% Very good
MC Read 27.6
MC Write 28.5
MC Mixed 23.5
76% 26.5 GB/s
SC Read 18.3
SC Write 29.9
SC Mixed 24
69% 24.1 GB/s
Latency 65.4
61% 65.4 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 75.8%
Great: 102%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z390 AORUS PRO-CF Builds (Compare 8,628 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 114%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 105%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO - $176

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 118% - Outstanding Total price: $777
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback