Apple iMac12,1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.57% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemApple iMac12,1  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-942B5BF58194151B
Memory2 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20150610
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateJan 10 '19 at 23:09
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2400S-$70
U2E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
68.9% Good
Memory 91.4
1-Core 73.6
2-Core 149
64% 105 Pts
4-Core 270
8-Core 272
36% 271 Pts
64-Core 270
17% 270 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 68.9%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6750M
Apple(106B 6741) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.812.0.0
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
5.57% Terrible
Lighting 6.83
Reflection 6.88
Parallax 5.38
6% 6.36 fps
MRender 7.1
Gravity 4.77
Splatting 8.09
6% 6.65 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.57%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Packard Bell Go 500GB
135GB free, PID 001b
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 23 23 23 23 23 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
13.9% Very poor
Read 28.8
Write 21.3
Mixed 21
SusWrite 23.1
31% 23.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
77% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 13.9%
Great: 19%
APPLE SD Card Reader 32GB
3GB free, PID 8403
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 14 14 14 14 14 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
6.43% Terrible
Read 18.5
Write 9
Mixed 9.8
SusWrite 13.6
16% 12.7 MB/s
4K Read 3.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
12% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.43%
Great: 17%
Lexar USB Flash Drive 8GB
1GB free, PID c75c
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.9 9 7.5 8.2 9 9 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
5.14% Terrible
Read 16.3
Write 5.5
Mixed 7.8
SusWrite 8.6
12% 9.55 MB/s
4K Read 3.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
14% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.14%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
51.8% Above average
MC Read 18.2
MC Write 18.7
MC Mixed 16.7
51% 17.9 GB/s
SC Read 14.2
SC Write 14.2
SC Mixed 15.3
42% 14.6 GB/s
Latency 65.2
61% 65.2 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 51.8%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical iMac12,1 Builds (Compare 104 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Apple iMac12,1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $98
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback