HP hp workstation xw8200

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics6.38% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive25.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory14GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 14GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemHP hp workstation xw8200  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 08B4h
Memory2.8 GB free of 14.001 GB @ 0.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20051222
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 10 '19 at 10:01
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon 3.40GHz
XU1 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
34.4% Below average
Memory 55.8
1-Core 27.4
2-Core 50.5
30% 44.6 Pts
4-Core 77.8
8-Core 77.7
10% 77.8 Pts
64-Core 78.2
5% 78.2 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 34.4%
Great: 36%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 2000
HP(103C 084A) 1GB
CLim: 625 MHz, MLim: 652 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 377.61
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
6.38% Terrible
Lighting 7.4
Reflection 8.69
Parallax 6.25
6% 7.45 fps
MRender 9.67
Gravity 7.83
Splatting 8.52
7% 8.67 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.38%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$112
139GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 88 94 104 108 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
25.3% Poor
Read 114
Write 104
Mixed 96
SusWrite 95.8
23% 102 MB/s
4K Read 21.6
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 11.3
50% 12.5 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 25.3%
Great: 124%
Seagate ST3160023AS 160GB-$24
71GB free
Firmware: 3.20
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 30 29 29 29 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
22.1% Poor
Read 47.5
Write 46.8
Mixed 27.8
SusWrite 29.1
28% 37.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
110% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 22.1%
Great: 32%
WD WD800JB-00JJC0 80GB
23GB free
Firmware: 05.01C05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 35 35 38 39 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
21.4% Poor
Read 38.3
Write 39
Mixed 26.7
SusWrite 35.9
26% 35 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
140% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 21.4%
Great: 31%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 47GB
null MHz
1024, 1024, 2048, 2048, 4096, 4096, 33792 MB
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
11.2% Very poor
MC Read 3.5
MC Write 2.8
MC Mixed 3.3
9% 3.2 GB/s
SC Read 3.8
SC Write 3.9
SC Mixed 3.7
11% 3.8 GB/s
Latency 140
28% 140 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.2%
Great: 102%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical hp workstation xw8200 Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HP hp workstation xw8200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback