Intel NUC7JYB

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.81% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive46.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemIntel NUC7PJYH
MotherboardIntel NUC7JYB  (all builds)
Memory0.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181219
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateJan 07 '19 at 07:38
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU 33%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium Silver J5005
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
36.2% Below average
Memory 41.9
1-Core 56.6
2-Core 109
39% 69.2 Pts
4-Core 177
8-Core 177
24% 177 Pts
64-Core 179
11% 179 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 36.2%
Great: 45%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 605
Intel(8086 2072) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 24.20.100.6286
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
1.81% Terrible
Lighting 2.3
Reflection 2.23
Parallax 2.75
2% 2.43 fps
MRender 2.1
Gravity 1.7
Splatting 2.3
2% 2.03 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.81%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$28
83GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 195 127 111 116 111 127 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
46.7% Average
Read 317
Write 169
Mixed 193
SusWrite 131
45% 203 MB/s
4K Read 21.2
4K Write 39.5
4K Mixed 19.1
78% 26.6 MB/s
DQ Read 53.3
DQ Write 58.5
DQ Mixed 50.6
40% 54.1 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 46.7%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5711-001.A00G 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
18.7% Very poor
MC Read 6.8
MC Write 7.5
MC Mixed 6.5
20% 6.93 GB/s
SC Read 3
SC Write 4.2
SC Mixed 2.8
10% 3.33 GB/s
Latency 194
21% 194 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 18.7%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical NUC7JYB Builds (Compare 285 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel NUC7JYB

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 20% - Very poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback