Asus M5A97 LE R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics3.49% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive77.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus M5A97 LE R2.0  (all builds)
Memory30.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20150324
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 31 '18 at 13:33
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 1.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
39.9% Below average
Memory 64.4
1-Core 18.4
2-Core 51.2
31% 44.7 Pts
4-Core 85.8
8-Core 163
15% 125 Pts
64-Core 161
10% 161 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 39.9%
Great: 68%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 630
Gigabyte(1458 3544) 2GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
3.49% Terrible
Lighting 4.3
Reflection 4.92
Parallax 3.5
4% 4.24 fps
MRender 5.81
Gravity 4.3
Splatting 3.09
4% 4.4 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.49%
Great: 5%
Nvidia GeForce GT 610
MSI(1462 809F) 2GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 250 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
1.78% Terrible
Lighting 2.23
Reflection 2.58
Parallax 1.78
2% 2.2 fps
MRender 2.33
Gravity 2.23
Splatting 1.78
2% 2.12 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.78%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 1TB-$72
815GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR022
SusWrite @10s intervals: 374 372 371 365 374 358 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
77.1% Very good
Read 435
Write 382
Mixed 360
SusWrite 369
87% 387 MB/s
4K Read 22.6
4K Write 37.5
4K Mixed 27
89% 29 MB/s
DQ Read 228
DQ Write 198
DQ Mixed 205
156% 210 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 77.1%
Great: 125%
Seagate ST3750640NS 750GB-$38
121GB free
Firmware: 3CNR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 48 48 48 49 49 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
27.4% Poor
Read 47.2
Write 47.9
Mixed 34.3
SusWrite 48.2
33% 44.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
123% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 27.4%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLT8G3D1608DT2TXOB 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1066 MHz clocked @ 533 MHz
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
33.2% Below average
MC Read 13
MC Write 10.6
MC Mixed 12.7
35% 12.1 GB/s
SC Read 6.4
SC Write 5.9
SC Mixed 8.5
20% 6.93 GB/s
Latency 115
35% 115 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 33.2%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A97 LE R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,465 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M5A97 LE R2.0 - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $377
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback