Asrock H110M-DVS R3.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics20.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (68%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock H110M-DVS R3.0  (all builds)
Memory5.5 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.1 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1440 x 900 - 32 Bit,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170417
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateDec 29 '18 at 08:42
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User BLR-User
Background CPU 68%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7400-$70
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
57.5% Above average
Memory 67.1
1-Core 83.3
2-Core 170
60% 107 Pts
4-Core 266
8-Core 339
39% 302 Pts
64-Core 358
22% 358 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 57.5%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 417.35
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
20.3% Poor
Lighting 20.1
Reflection 28.8
Parallax 33.8
16% 27.6 fps
MRender 35.2
Gravity 34.5
Splatting 33.2
28% 34.3 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 20.3%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 500GB (2012)
131GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 44 75 64 95 96 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
45% Average
Read 89.7
Write 93.2
Mixed 66.2
SusWrite 66.9
58% 79 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.1
75% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 45%
Great: 79%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$26
296GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 119 116 119 117 120 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
76.7% Very good
Read 149
Write 130
Mixed 36.7
SusWrite 118
79% 109 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.5
118% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 76.7%
Great: 107%
Wilk 32GB
27GB free, PID 4200
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.4 10 9.3 9.6 9.9 8.5 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
9.43% Terrible
Read 24.7
Write 8.2
Mixed 5.8
SusWrite 9.4
14% 12 MB/s
4K Read 5.7
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.6
69% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 9.43%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown PSD44G213381 1315 CT8G4DFS824A.C8FAD1 12GB
2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
41% Average
MC Read 16.9
MC Write 14.8
MC Mixed 12.3
42% 14.7 GB/s
SC Read 10
SC Write 11.3
SC Mixed 11.2
31% 10.8 GB/s
Latency 108
37% 108 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 41%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H110M-DVS R3.0 Builds (Compare 894 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock H110M-DVS R3.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $157
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $158
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback